Skip to main content
iRubric: Storage System Design rubric

iRubric: Storage System Design rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Storage System Design 
Storage System Design
Evaluation of the Design of a Storage system for 800ton of a chemical product in 2000 square meters
Rubric Code: SXBA5C2
By mariagomegal
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Storage System Design
  Beginner

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3.8 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Presentation

Beginner

The document in poorly presented, margins are not aligned, no effort at formatting the cover, sections or titles was made
Fair

It is evident that there was some format used, but either margin alignment, title format, or sections are not evident
Good

The document has been drawn with a coherent format for front page, sections and titles, with care for alignment
Excellent

Format of document includes aspects like a differentiating front cover, with use of color, footnotes, sections, and figures correctly identified.
Spelling & Grammar

Beginner

There are more than 4 different spelling errors and / or the writing is deficient to the point that the idea is not understandable
Fair

There are up to 2 different spelling errors and / or there are sections of the document in which the idea is not completely understandable or clear, or the ideas are truncated or do not flow between each other
Good

There are no spelling errors but there are typing errors that do not prevent the understanding of the text and / or there are ideas that have been written incorrectly, or ideas may not flow from one to another, and /or the lack of use of basic technical vocabulary is evident
Excellent

There are no spelling or typographical errors. The writing is adequate, and flows from one idea to another, the use of technical terminology is evident.
Citation

Beginner

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 6 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. more than 50% of sources are not valid
Fair

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 4 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. No more than a 30% o sources are not valid or serious
Good

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 2 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. Less than 10% of Sources are not valid or serious
Excellent

All citations and references of data sources, tables and figures are found in the document. And all the sources are valid and serious
Design Elementens: Containers

Beginner

There is no description of the containers, or is extremely vague. Selection of container is unsubstantieted. No information on material was given
Fair

The container description, or quantity is not complete, or there is very little information regarding container selection. Material selection was not substantieted
Good

The container description is given, some information regarding selection was offered. Quantity was defined and logically selected or calculated
Material selection was given
Excellent

Aditionally other options were considered for type of container, material, number, and orientaition.
Design Elements: in/out Transport

Beginner

Only a hint regarding the reception, internal movement and discharge of product was given
Fair

A description of reception, discharge, and internal movement was given, but may not be logical or complete
Good

A description of reception, discharge, and internal movement was given, it is logical and shows the tought process. Some tought on installations or equipments or personal but not thought out completely.
Excellent

A logical and thought out description of reception, discharge, and internal movement was given, with considerations to personal responsabilities and necessity of additional installations or equipments
Design Elements: Other installation

Beginner

The document does not show or consider additional installations or need for auxiliary equipments or services
Fair

There is consideration of auxiliary buildings or equipments, or services, but no effort was put forth in their design or specification
Good

There is consideration of auxiliary buildings, equipment or services
Excellent

There is consideration of auxiliary buildings, equipment or services, and they are logical and possible.
Design Elements: Work areas

Beginner

The design does not contemplate administrative areas, social, service and rest areas, and/or security
Fair

The design considers some aspects for administrative, social, rest, service and security areas
Good

The design includes consdierations for administrative, service, social, rest and security areas
Excellent

The design includes consdierations for administrative, service, social, rest and security areas, and are logical and coheren with the complexity of the system
Plans & Drawings

Beginner

The document does not include a floor plan or a diagram of containers, and/or do not have measurements and distances shown, or are drawn by hand
Fair

The document includes either a floor plan or container diagram, and/or only show some basic distances or measurements, and/or is drawn with little care for detail
Good

The document includes both a floor diagram and a container drawing, and measurements and distances are evident, and some degree of detail is present
Excellent

The document includes both a floor diagram and container drawing with masurements and distances, and additionally are coherent and neat, with good detail showing accesories.
Design coherence

Beginner

The document does not present a logical sequence to the design
Fair

The document shows some reasoning for the design (less than 70%), but ideas are segregated
Good

The document shows coherence in the decision making process, and over 70% of design elements are justified
Excellent

The document shows the thought process for the design, decisions are based on contrasting options and the use of an identifiable criterion for decision making.
Calculations & additional material

Beginner

The document does not contain calculations and/or any complementary information
Fair

The document contains some calculations and/or some complementary information
Good

The document contains all calculations and some complementary information
Excellent

The document contains all calculations and some complementary information. the calculations are correct, and the complementary information is pertinent to the information given in the document



Keywords:
  • chemical engineering workshop

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98