Skip to main content
iRubric: Anatomy "Purposeful Design" Paper 1st Semester rubric

iRubric: Anatomy "Purposeful Design" Paper 1st Semester rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Anatomy "Purposeful Design" Paper 1st Semester 
Anatomy "Common Design" Paper
Paper on "Purposeful Design". Discuss evidence(s) provided by material within Modules (Systems) covered to date supporting a purposeful design by a Creator. This should be written as a short discussion paper. Please include descriptions of main structures, concepts and keywords (diagrams, charts etc) to explain the correlation of structures and functions used to convey your ideas. MLA format,2.5- 3.0 typed pages of discussion an any diagrams or pictures placed in an appendix section.
Rubric Code: SXB8B5X
By Warburtn
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Rubric
  Rubric

(N/A)

Rubric

(N/A)

Rubric

(N/A)

Rubric

(N/A)

Anatomy Discussion Paper
  Poor

0-10 points

1 pts

Fair

10-15 points

2 pts

Good

15-18 points

3 pts

Excellent

18-20 points

4 pts

Evidences
65 %

Poor

Little or no evidences of purposeful design or related ideas presented. Little or no correlation among Module material.
Fair

Evidences of purposeful design or ideas are unclear and/or mostly incorrect. Text includes minimal correlation among Module material.
Good

Evidences of purposeful design or ideas presented are clear and mostly correct. Body of paper includes some details of correlation among Module material.
Excellent

Evidences of purposeful design or ideas presented are clear and correct. Body of paper includes details, correlation among Module material.
Grammar/Structure
15 %

Poor

Many errors in spelling, punctuation, or capitalization. Little or no effort to construct an organized text.

No outline, less than 2.5 pages, improper font/spacing
Fair

Many errors in spelling, punctuation, or capitalization. Text is poorly organized or lacks logical transition of thoughts.

No outline, proper font/spacing minimum 2.5 pages
Good

Some errors (<5) in spelling, punctuation, or capitalization. Structure and organization of the text is mostly easy to follow/logical. Interesting to read.

Outline, proper font/spacing minimum 3 pages of discussion text
Excellent

Minimal errors (<2) in spelling, punctuation, or capitalization. Structure of the text is easy to follow. Organization is logical. Interesting to read.

Outline, proper font/spacing, pages 3+ additional diagrams, chart , pictures etc
Personal Integration
20 %

Poor

Little or no creative thought or student originated ideas. Little or no effort demonstrated regarding personal thought of concept
Fair

Minimal originality. Exhibits minimal effort of personal thought regarding concept
Good

Use of original idea(s) clearly evident. Demonstrates thought regarding application of concept's ideas in own life or God's creation
Excellent

Very original discussion; captures attention. Demonstrates great effort. Very carefully executed discussion with attention to detail regarding the concept.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16