Skip to main content
iRubric: Robotic Engineering rubric

iRubric: Robotic Engineering rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Robotic Engineering 
Robotic Engineering - Sumo
This rubric is designed to assess the design of the individual's SUMO robot including programming and competition.
Rubric Code: SXAA88C
By ctackett
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Robot Design Rubric
  Exemplary

Shows outstanding effort meeting most if not all elements of design criteria

4 pts

Proficient

Shows significant effort, but lacks some elements of the assignment.

3 pts

Developing

Shows minimal effort w/disregard to assignment instructions.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Shows none to almost no effort.

1 pts

Concept Requirement

Exemplary

Robot is controlled easily, with no errors.

Robot base stable and robust.

Attachments modular, function as expected and easily completes tasks assigned.

Robots perform tasks extremely well and are repeatable.

Base design easily followed with no build issues
Proficient

Slow robot assembly, with 5 or less errors

Robot base stable, but not robust.

Attachments function most of the time;

Base design easily followed with some mistakes made
Developing

Robot assembly done with 5 to 10 errors.

Robot base structure has some stability.

Attachments difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise.

Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.

Base design followed will some difficulty
Needs Improvement

Difficulty with robot assembly of base bot

Robot assembly done with more than 10 errors or is not built.

Base design not followed easily
Control System

Exemplary

Completes 3 rounds without breaking.

Adjusts speed and position sensing for optimum speed and accuracy.

Turns accurately and consistently.

Allows for variables.

Your robot was successful, it performed successfully in the Vex arena.
Proficient

Completes 3 rounds without breaks most of the time.

Not too fast for accuracy or too slow to accomplish fight

Turns reasonably accurate and consistent.

Allows for variables

Your robot could perform most of the challenges successful in the arena.
Developing

Completes 3 rounds with some breaks in between to repair minor damage

Turns sometimes accurate.

Your robot did something, but did not perform well in competition that it was supposed to.
Needs Improvement

Difficulty competing in 3 rounds without fixes between each round

Too fast for accuracy, or too slow to accomplish objectives.

Turns inaccurate or inconsistent.

Robot did not perform at all.
Programming

Exemplary

Programs logically organized.

Programs very efficient.

Programs always work, even for complex tasks.

Sensors, if used, guarantee certain actions in every trial.

Programs work in competition as in practice.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are effective.

Students can describe how the robot is programmed.
Proficient

Programs organized.

Programs efficient at completing most tasks.

Programs do what they're expected to do.

Sensors used effectively, if used.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are needed.

Student can describe most of program and its effects.
Developing

Programs somewhat organized

Programs efficient at completing some tasks.

Results somewhat unpredictable

Programs do some of what is expected

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, not understood.
Needs Improvement

Programs disorganized

Programs inefficient

Sensors inadequately used.

Programs do not accomplish expected tasks.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions defined but unused.

Student can't describe what run will do.
Student Participation

Exemplary

Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows thorough understanding of underlying design, science, and technology.

Building/programming was done by individual.

Always willing to help and do more.
Did their share and helped others to complete.

Routinely offered useful ideas.
Proficient

Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows moderate understanding of underlying design, science, and technology.

Building/programming mostly directed by individual/team members, with help from instructor.

Cooperative with the others

Did their part of the work.

Usually offered useful ideas.
Developing

Knowledge of robot structure and programming shows minimal understanding of underlying design, science, and technology.

Building and programming seems primarily directed by instructor.

Sometimes cooperated with the others

Could have done more.

Sometimes offered useful ideas.
Needs Improvement

Little knowledge of why some parts are located as they are on the robot.

Little or no understanding of what pieces did.

Building/programming appears primarily done by instructor.

Seldom cooperated with other.

Hardly did any work on the robot themselves.

Rarely offered useful ideas.



Keywords:
  • Robot Design


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98