- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Media Law Moot Court Oral Argument:First Amendment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Media Law Moot Court Oral Argument:First Amendment Media Law Moot Court Oral Argument:First Amendment Rubric Code: SX44W4C By Jeatlaw Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Moot Court Oral Argument
	Excellent 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Presentation/Speech	Excellent Students demonstrate outstanding effort on the delivery of their argument. Students show excellent eye contact, emotion and preparation.	Fair Students demonstrate sufficient effort on the delivery of their argument. Students attempt to make eye contact and display sufficient preparation and rehearsal.	Poor Students do not display any effort in preparing for their argument. Students only read from their prepared statements.
Use of Case Law	Excellent Students give at least 2 case law citations. They are used in proper context and serve to strengthen the argument of their side.	Fair Students give at least 1 case law citation. They are used in proper context and serve to strengthen the argument of their side.	Poor Students do not give case law in their presentation.
Persuasiveness	Excellent Students are outstanding in their use of language that is persuasive. Students demonstrate strong understanding of the issue at hand and provide a clear and convincing argument.	Fair Students use language that is persuasive. Students demonstrate adequate understanding of the issue at hand. Student may be slightly off topic.	Poor Students do not demonstrate understanding of the issue. Students are way off topic.
Knowledge	Excellent Students demonstrate strong knowledge of free speech interpretations and tests. Students regularly use free speech terms and tests in an accurate way.	Fair Students have some understanding of free speech knowledge. May have one inaccuracy such as incorrect application of free speech test.	Poor Students do not demonstrate understanding of free speech interpretations and tests.
Organization/Group effort	Excellent Oral argument is well organized and demonstrates strong preparation by the team. All team members participate in a meaningful way.	Fair Oral argument is sufficiently organized and demonstrates adequate preparation by the team. Team members participate, but not always meaningful.	Poor Argument is not organized. No preparation or rehearsal is apparent.