Skip to main content
iRubric: CRITICAL THINKING Rubric

iRubric: CRITICAL THINKING Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CRITICAL THINKING Rubric 
Critical thinking involves issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before forming an opinion or conclusion. This rubric is designed to be transdisciplinary for all content areas to use inquiry and analysis. Successful critical thinkers need to apply those habits in various situations throughout life.This rubric is designed for use with many different types of assignments on analyses of text, data, or issues.
Rubric Code: S2X8369
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Critical Thinking VALUE Rubric
  EXCEEDING

4 pts

PROFICIENT

3 pts

GETTING THERE

2 pts

NEEDS HELP

1 pts

ExplanatioN of issues

EXCEEDING

Issue/problem to be considered is stated clearly with all relevant information necessary for full understanding AND goes further.
PROFICIENT

Issue/problem to be considered is stated clearly with relevant information necessary for full understanding.
GETTING THERE

Issue/problem to be considered is stated clearly with some relevant information necessary for full understanding.
NEEDS HELP

Issue/problem to be considered is NOT clearly stated and information necessary for full understanding is NOT present..
Evidence

Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion

EXCEEDING

Information selected is taken from 4+ sources with quality content to develop a comprehensive analysis. Expert viewpoints are verified.
PROFICIENT

Information selected is taken from 3 quality source(s) with enough content to develop a comprehensive analysis. Expert viewpoints are verified.
GETTING THERE

Information selected is taken from 2 quality source(s) with enough content to develop a comprehensive analysis. Expert viewpoints are verified.
Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning.
NEEDS HELP

Information is taken from a source AND without any analysis.
Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question.
COMPARE/CONTRAST

EXCEEDING

Thoroughly compares others' assumptions and the relevance of context when presenting a viewpoint.
PROFICIENT

Identifies and compares own and others' viewpoints and 3 others when presenting a viewpoint.
GETTING THERE

Identifies and compares own viewpoint and 2 other viewpoints. Questions some assumptions.
NEEDS HELP

Identifies and compares own viewpoint and 2 other viewpoints. Questions some assumptions. Identifies own viewpoint to an extent and may identify 1 other relevant viewpoint
Conclusions

Conclusions and outcome

EXCEEDING

Conclusion is logically tied to all viewpoints; related outcomes, and consequences
PROFICIENT

Conclusion is logically tied to most viewpoints; related outcomes, and consequences
GETTING THERE

Conclusion is logically are somewhat tied to all viewpoints; related outcomes, and consequences
NEEDS HELP

Conclusion is loosely tied to all viewpoints; related outcomes, and consequences



Keywords:
  • Critical thinking, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Context, Literal meaning, Metaphor

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98