Skip to main content
iRubric: Student Engagement Instrument rubric

iRubric: Student Engagement Instrument rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Engagement Instrument 
Engagement Rubric for teacher assessment of Modules developed for an mobile learning apps (MLA)
Rubric Code: S2W2827
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Survey  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Engaging Students in Learning
85 %
  Distinguished

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Basic

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Looking at …

Notes of what to look for

(N/A)

Activities & Assignments
50 %

Have the assignments led to understanding by the students?

Distinguished

All students are cognitively engaged in the activities and assignments in their exploration of content. Students initiate or adapt activities and projects to enhance their understanding.
Proficient

Most activities and assignments are appropriate to students, and almost all of the students are cognitively engaged in exploring content.
Basic

Activities and assignments are appropriate to some students and engage them mentally, but others are not engaged.
Unsatisfactory

Activities and assignments are inappropriate for students' age or background. Students are not mentally engaged in them.
Looking at …

Looking at not only the directions for the activities and assignments themselves, but the quality of student work in response to the directions. Their work, even when incorrect, reflects serious thinking.
Grouping of students
10 %

Have my attempts to engage students in discussion been productive and useful?

Distinguished

Instructional groups are productive and fully appropriate to the students or to the instructional purposes of the lesson. Students take the initiative to influence the formation or adjustment of instructional groups.
Proficient

Instructional groups are productive and fully appropriate to the students or to the instructional purposes of the lesson.
Basic

Instructional groups are only partially appropriate to the students or only moderately successful in advancing the instructional outcomes of the lesson.
Unsatisfactory

Instructional groups are inappropriate to the students or to the instructional outcomes.
Looking at …

Variation is usually helpful, and grouping should not be used exclusively.
Instructional materials & resources
20 %

Have there been scaffolding, UD and MI adaptations for all students?

Distinguished

Instructional materials and resources are suitable to the instructional purposes and engage students mentally. Students initiate the choice, adaptation, or creation of materials to enhance their learning.
Proficient

Instructional materials and resources are suitable to the instructional purposes and engage students mentally.
Basic

Instructional materials and resources are only partially suitable to the instructional purposes, or the students are only partially mentally engaged with them.
Unsatisfactory

Instructional materials and resources are unsuitable to the instructional purposes or do not engage students mentally.
Looking at …

Resources can include outside visitor.
Structure and pacing
20 %

Was the pace too fast or slow?

Distinguished

The lesson's structure is highly coherent, allowing for reflection and closure. Pacing of the lesson is appropriate for all students.
Proficient

The lesson has a clearly defined structure around which the activities are organized. Pacing of the lesson is generally appropriate.
Basic

The lesson has a recognizable structure, although it is not uniformly maintained throughout the lesson. Pacing of the lesson is inconsistent.
Unsatisfactory

The lesson has no clear defined structure, or the pace of the lesson is too slow or rushed, or both.
Looking at …

Students should know where they are in the structure. May have a beginning, middle and end, with a clear introduction and closing, or be more of a working session.
Student Survey Results
15 % Making an attempt to weigh student's input on engagement.
  n/a

(N/A)

n/a

(N/A)

Deep

4 pts

Superficial

1 pts

Looking at …

Notes of what to look for

(N/A)

Cognitive Engagment
50 %
Facts vs. Understanding
60 %

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students believe they do more problem solving, and thinking of what is behind the facts, than memorization.
Superficial

Students prefer to memorize facts, than to solve problems or understand the principles behind everything.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Transferability
25 %

Students' ability to apply knowledge and skills acquired to new situations.

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students wonder how much the things they have learned can be applied to real life, and/or how much they relate to other subjects.
Superficial

Students do not consider how they might be able to use this stuff in the real world. Rather, they feel that they are just jumping through the hoops.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Reading
5 %

Reading critically information from any references

n/a
n/a
Deep

When students read the materials they pay more attention to what looks like the important stuff.
Superficial

When students read, they read straight through without focusing any one thing more than any other.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Meta-Cognitive Strategies
10 %

How students manage the learning processes such as planning and seeking information

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students are well managed the learning process including planning and seeking information, elaborate the information into mind mapping
Superficial

Students do not manage the learning process as well as not planning the process of finding information and breaking down incomplete information into mind mapping.
Looking at …

Teachers' observation
Affective Engagement
25 %
Interest
95 %

These criteria should be separated. But this rubric doesn't subdivide further.

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students like attending the class. Students find the subject interesting and the learning of it enjoyable. They feel a sense of satisfaction when working in this subject and in this class. They are always curious to learn new things in this course and feel excited when starting a new topic.
Superficial

Students dislike attending the class. Students are tired of the subject, and find the learning of it unpleasant. They dislike working in this subject and in this class. They are not curious to learn new things in this course and are bored and uncomfortable starting a new topic.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Anxiety
5 %

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students welcome the challenge of the examinations.
Superficial

Students feel nervous before the exam.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Behavioral Engagement
25 %
Attentiveness
60 %

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students listen to the teacher’s instruction attentively, and concentrate very hard when the teacher introduces new concepts. In the discussion of new topics, they take an active part and raise their <BR>
points. They really make an effort in the lessons. They use every means to understand what the teacher teaches in this subject.
Superficial

Students do not listen to the teacher’s instruction attentively, or concentrate very hard when the teacher introduces new concepts. In the discussion of new topics, they do not take an active part and raise their points. They don't make much effort in the lessons. They don't use every means to understand what the teacher teaches in this subject.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Diligence
25 %

n/a
n/a
Deep

For difficult assignments, students study hard until they understand them. If they make mistakes in assignments, they work until they have corrected them.
Superficial

For difficult assignments, students give up quickly. If they make mistakes in assignments, they don't bother correcting them.
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Time Spent
10 %

n/a
n/a
Deep

Under construction
Superficial

Under construction
Looking at …

Use survey questions or interview questions, asking directly
Posture
5 %

Not sure where to put this one, but contrary to Danielson do feel that it can be a valid indicator.

n/a
n/a
Deep

Students are well postured: sitting up straight, square in chair, eyes on speaker
Superficial

Students are ill postured: slouching, body and eyes not facing speaker
Looking at …

Teachers' observation



Keywords:
  • Student Engagement; Danieslson







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98