Skip to main content

iRubric: AWAKE-STEM: Critical Thinking Unit 2 Recycling rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AWAKE-STEM: Critical Thinking Unit 2 Recycling 
7th Grade 2nd Period Critical Thinking Rubric for each team of students that participated in the 2nd PBL unit. Recycling Unit 2.
Rubric Code: S2488A5
By ChristinaE
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric AWAKE-STEM: Critical Thinking Rubric
Recycling
Boyd
Franklin
Espinoza
Montgomery
  1 Emerging

1 pts

2 Developing

2 pts

3 Demonstrating

3 pts

4 Exceeding

4 pts

Point Value

(N/A)

Explanation/Analysis
pts

1 Emerging

Summarizes STEM topics and concepts, notes only important details and uses evidence as support.
2 Developing

Analyzes STEM concepts using a chain of reasoning to uncover interrelationships.

Interprets the meaning of a STEM topic in relation to an issue.

Mentions a STEM career.
3 Demonstrating

Analyzes STEM concepts using a chain of reasoning to uncover interrelationships and patterns.

Interprets the meaning of a STEM topic in relation to a local issue.

Mentions a STEM career related issue in the local community.
4 Exceeding

Analyzes STEM concepts using a chain of reasoning to uncover interrelationships, patterns, inconsistencies, and/or counterexamples.

Interprets the meaning of a STEM topic in relation to a local issue and provides a detailed analysis of the relevance to the local community.

Explains how the topic addresses a STEM career related issue in the local community.
Point Value

4
Interpretation/Evidence
pts

1 Emerging

Draws conclusions about a STEM topic using evidence-based inferences and reasoning.
2 Developing

Draws logical conclusions about a STEM topic using evidence-based inferences and reasoning from multiple sources considering the quality and limitations of evidence, claims and counterclaims.

Involves the local community when determining issue.

Draws on evidence from similar communities.
3 Demonstrating

Draws logical conclusions about a STEM topic using evidence-based inferences and reasoning from multiple sources considering the quality and limitations of evidence, claims and counterclaims.

Involves the local community when determining issue.

Draws on evidence from similar communities.
4 Exceeding

Draws logical conclusions about a STEM topic and generalizes to other concepts using evidence-based inferences and reasoning from multiple sources considering the quality and limitations of evidence, claims, and counterclaims.

Builds strong relationships and involves the local community as the main source when determining issue.

Draws on evidence from similar communities.


Incorporates the impact on the local community when drawing conclusions.
Point Value

3
Evaluation
pts

1 Emerging

Uses provided criteria and an evaluation of the evidence to compare and contrast information and/or perspectives.
2 Developing

Evaluates the quality, (including limitations) of the reasoning, information, sources, and/or evidence used to make a claim or argument.
3 Demonstrating

Evaluates the quality and credibility of the reasoning, information, sources, and/or evidence used to make a claim or argument.

Detects inconsistencies or fallacies in a claim or argument.
4 Exceeding

Evaluates the quality and credibility of the reasoning, information, sources, and/or evidence used to make a claim or argument.

Addresses the strengths, limitations, and sources of error or bias in a claim or argument.

Evaluates the applicability of evidence and arguments for the context of the local community.
Point Value

3




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n7