Skip to main content
iRubric: 4C: Art Research Presentation Rubric

iRubric: 4C: Art Research Presentation Rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
4C: Art Research Presentation Rubric 
Research the artistic treasures of Florence we read about and present a piece to your audience.
Rubric Code: S23454B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Criterio
  Eccellente

5 pts

Molto Bene

4 pts

Di Media qualita'

3 pts

Povera presentazione

2 pts

Inaccettabile

1 pts

Summary and Submission
5 %

Eccellente

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use research and appropriate materials to gather details
- presentation is coherent and well supported by excellent sources concerning an artist or artwork
- submitted the assignment on time.
Molto Bene

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use research and appropriate materials to gather details concerning an artist or artwork
- presentation is coherent and supported by good sources
- Student submitted the assignment on time.
Di Media qualita'

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use research and appropriate materials to gather details concerning an artist or artwork
- presentation is coherent and supported by good sources
- Student submitted the assignment on time.
Povera presentazione

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use research and appropriate materials to gather details and presented with little understanding of their research topic
- Student failed to submit the assignment on time.
Inaccettabile

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Content & Development
5 %

Eccellente

- Art fully identified: Title; artist, date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and informative.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Molto Bene

- Art fully identified: Title; artist; date.
- Content is accurate and informative.
- Major points are stated and supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Di Media qualita'

- Art fully identifed: Title; artist; date.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or informative.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Povera presentazione

- Art not fully identified: Title; artist; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or informative.
Inaccettabile

- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Organization & Structure
5 %

Eccellente

-Structure of the presentation is clear and easy to follow.
-Main points are clear and relate clearly to the content of the presentation.
- Transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the presentation.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the report.
Molto Bene

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-Main points are clear and relate to content of the presentation.
- Logical transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Di Media qualita'

- Structure of the presentation is not easy to follow.
- Transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the report.
Povera presentazione

- Organisation and structure detract from the message of the presenter.
- Main points are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Inaccettabile

- Unacceptable
- No identifiable main point.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Format and Length
5 %

Eccellente

- A visually pleasing presentation was given enhanced by the use of a visual aid.
- Presenter used excellent presentation skills such as eye contact, clarity and expression.
- Presentation was at least 4 mins in length
Molto Bene

- A visually pleasing presentation was given enhanced by the use of visual aids.
- Presenters used good presentation skills such as eye contact, clarity and expression.
- Presentation was at least 3.30 mins in length
Di Media qualita'

- A presentation was given enhanced by the use of visual aids.
- Presenters used good presentation skills such as eye contact, clarity and expression.
- Presentation was at least 3 mins in length
Povera presentazione

- A presentation was given with some visual aids.
- Presenters used some or poor presentation skills
- Presentation was less than 2-2.30 mins in length.
Inaccettabile

- Unacceptable
- A presentation was not given or was poorly done or less than 2 minutes in length.



Keywords:
  • Lezione 3 Progetto Immagina







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2022 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202