- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Grading Rubric for Reflection Paper

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Grading Rubric for Reflection Paper Reflection paper Rubric Code: S22W94C By adelossantos Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Reflection Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Reflection Paper 100 %
	Poor A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer. 0 pts	Fair The assigned category needs work. 1 pts	Good There is a fair effort to do the reflection. 2.5 pts	Very Good The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article. 4 pts	Excellent The writer completely covers all required information. 5 pts
Observance of submission guidelines 10 % Is able to submit on time and follow the guidelines/mechanics on writing the paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margin, font standards, etc)	Poor Late submission and/or does not comply totally with any of the mechanics.	Fair Late submission and/or observes less than 50% of the guidelines.	Good Late submission and/or observes 75% of the guidelines.	Very Good Late submission and/or misses an item in the mechanics.	Excellent Submitted on time and follows all the mechanics in writing the paper.
Independent critical thinking 30 % Uses logical and critical thinking in reflecting on theme and cited texts. Derives insights from texts/materials discussed in class.	Poor No exercise of independent critical thinking at all.	Fair Poor exercise of critical thinking.	Good There is an average effort for critical thinking/analysis.	Very Good One or more implications are given and are sufficiently clarified.	Excellent Implications are clearly explicated and demonstrate critical thinking skills
Personal experiences 30 % The writer shares how what they have learned will affect them personally.	Poor No personal impacts are given.	Fair Personal impact is poorly developed in the reflection.	Good Effort to develop and reflect on personal impact(s) is just fair.	Very Good Personal impact are clearly mentioned and expanded on.	Excellent The personal impact of the writer are fully explained and related to the given theme or topic.
integration of ideas 30 % Integrates the experience with related texts and insights derived from critical thinking.	Poor No attempt to relate the experience with texts/materials/insights.	Fair Very little attempt to integrate/synthesize (needs expounding)	Good Needs to improve more on integrating/synthesizing experiences and theological insights.	Very Good A very good attempt to integrate/synthesize experiences and insights.	Excellent Integrates personal experiences and insights very well, and comes up with deep relevant insights.