iRubric: GameMaker Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

GameMaker Project

This rubric is for use with a project using the Basic Stamp microprocessor and Basic Stamp software. It is designed to be a three to four week program.

Rubric Code: RXX2W55

By mmahoney619

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Basic Stamp Project
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 20 pts	Good 30 pts	Great 40 pts
Project Plan	Poor No project management present. Goals not met. No write up present.	Fair Project had some tasks identified, more than one person was assigned specific jobs. Some tasks were completed. Some goals were met. Finished some tasks on time. No write up present.	Good Most tasks were identified and assigned. Most tasks were completed as designed. One or two goals or time frames were not met. Project write up was complete.	Great Tasks were identified and assigned to members. Each task was completed appropriately according to design and timeline. Original goals were met. Project write up was complete.
Design	Poor Little or no design present one requirement present.	Fair Basic design, at least two requirements are present. Not updated.	Good Design is mostly complete, at least 3 requirements are present some updates, but not current.	Great Design is complex, includes flow chart, and timeline. Goals and written description of project are present. Schematics exist and are readable. Design has been updated to represent final project, and all versions are included.
Game Play	Poor Game has no logical design. No scoring or advancement.	Fair Game has a purpose but the steps for reaching goals are not clearly articulated. Difficult to understand game flow. Incorporates game scoring.	Good Purpose of the game can be determined through play, but not always defined clearly, most actions follow a logical progression. Game scoring is clear and at least one advancement is present.	Great Purpose of the game is clear and cause and effect of actions follows logical progression. Game is scored correctly and more than one advancement is present.
Objects	Poor No or one object present, no actions associated with it.	Fair At least three distinct objects are present, some actions and inter-actions are present, but not working correctly for all cases.	Good At least three distinct objects are present, actions and interactions are present for all objects including collisions. Results from actions are mostly expected, some flaws.	Great At least five objects are present with all appropriate actions and interactions, including 3 different types of collisions. Results are expected and accurate.
Astetics	Poor Very little thought was given to the overall theme of the game, sprites, music, rooms and backgrounds do not correspond.	Fair Very basic theme is present, some elements seem to correspond. Purpose of some elements is not apparent. Does not incorporate all required items.	Good Game theme is apparent most elements seem to correspond well to each other and the purpose of each is clear. One or two required items are not present.	Great Game theme is clear and all required elements are present and correspond well, purpose of all elements is clear.
Programming and Documentation	Poor No documentation is present. Code is hard to follow.	Fair Some documentation is present missing at least 2 requirements. Some of the code is understandable, but much is difficult to follow.	Good All documentation is present, but is not well written. Code is fairly easy to understand.	Great All documentation is present and well written. It is easy to read and understand all instructions, as well as program code.
Team Work	Poor Very little team work was observed, and project was not entirely completed.	Fair Some team work was observed. Most of the work was completed by one project member. Almost completed project.	Good Group did very well working as a group, work was well divided. However project was not completed in the time frame.	Great All group members shared work equally. Work was entirely completed according to deadlines.
Personal Reflection/Individual	Poor No personal reflection done. Little work completed on project	Fair Short paragraph only addressed one or two required components. Completed some assigned tasks.	Good Personal reflection was well written all components were present. Did not complete all assigned tasks.	Great Personal reflection was well written with all required components. Individual work was completed as assigned.

Keywords:

programming, gamemaker, video game

Subjects:

Computers

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric