iRubric: Presentation and Group Work Assessment rubric

Student said little that actually contributed to the explanation of the diagram (said nothing or rambled).

Explanation was lacking or unsubstantial rambling. Group members had to take over or cover for student during/after their part of the presentation. Student took way less or way more than 1/4 the total time.

Student presented part of a diagram that showed basic understanding of what was occurring, but not necessarily the topic being covered. The class seemed a bit confused but seemed to understand overall.

Explanation was lacking--someone else had to add additional explanation of their part.

Student presented an explanation of a section of the diagram that demonstrated understanding of the topic and could be generally understood by the class.

Explanation was concise and either explained half of one diagram or took about 1/4 the total time.

Student presented a cohesive explanation of a section of a diagram. My explanation demonstrated my own deep understanding of the topic and could be understood by the class.

Explanation was thorough yet concise and either explained half of one diagram or took about 1/4 the total time.

Both student and group members wrote that:

Student did not work with group or had a poor attitude towards the project/group.

Student was distracted or disruptive during discussions and did not listen to others' opinions.

Student was not respectful when addressing group and dismissed many of their ideas.

*This behavior was also noted during class time.

Both student and group members wrote that:

Student worked with group and maintained a neutral attitude.

Student listened to opinions they liked or agreed with but was distracted at other times.

Student mostly used a respectful tone but dismissed ideas they thought were bad.

*This behavior was also noted during class time.

Both student and group members wrote that:

student helped maintain a positive group atmosphere.

student listened to everyone's opinions in group.

student used a respectful tone with peers and did not dismiss anyone's ideas.

*This behavior was also noted during class time.

Both student and group members wrote that:

student set a positive group atmosphere.

student encouraged everyone in the group to speak up/ asked for everyone's opinions.

student used a respectful tone with peers and did not dismiss anyone's ideas.

*This behavior was also noted during class time.

Student provided no useful feedback for peers.

Content was not constructive nor offered any tips for peer improvement.

Student was short or rude in critique.

Student provided some useful feedback for peers.

Content included general ways in which peers could maybe improve.

Student maintained a neutral tone in written critique.

Student provided useful feedback for peers.

Content included general ways in which peers could improve.

Student demonstrated respectful group dynamics in written critique.

Student provided useful and encouraging feedback for peers.

Content included specific ways in which peers could improve.

Student demonstrated respectful and encouraging group dynamics in written critique.