Skip to main content
iRubric: Technology Plan Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Technology Plan Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Technology Plan Evaluation 
Rubric Code: RXAA8AB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric K-12 District Technology Plan
Rubric designed to evaluate Technology Plan for Toledo Public Schools. (Project 1- ETPT 6300)
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Mission Statement

TPS Mission Statement- Formal summary statement of overall district goals.

Poor

Missing or incomplete mission statement/ Vision statement.
Fair

Mission statement/ Vision statement lists how technology will be used to improve student learning and aide teachers and administrators, but instructional outcomes are not stated.
Good

Mission statement/ Vision statement is clear and concise. The team has included how technology will be used to improve student learning and aide teachers and administrators. Instructional outcomes are fully stated.
Demographic Information

TPS Demographic Information

Poor

Missing Demographic Information.
Fair

Technology plan has demographic information included but not specific in breakdown.
Good

Technology plan has full demographic information. It lists all information for the district with specific breakdown.
Professional Development

Poor

Missing or incomplete professional Development information.
Fair

Has a plan for professional development that lays out a timeline for how and when all staff will be trained when new technologies are acquired. Does not have funding allocated to PD.
Good

Has a plan for professional development that lays out a timeline for how and when all staff will be trained when new technologies are acquired. Has funding allocated to PD.
Curriculum Integration

Poor

Missing or incomplete Curriculum Integration.
Fair

Plan provides overview of the current and future use of technology in enhancing the teaching-learning process for students. Little detail on how technology will be integrated into learning and curriculum.
Good

Plan fully states how technology will be integrated into the curriculum. Provides clear and strong description of how technology is currently used in learning environment and ways it will be used to achieve instructional outcomes; describes how technology will enhance curriculum and teaching and learning strategies; is tightly coupled to other reform efforts; indicates what students will do using the technology.
Infrastructure & Equipment

Plan for current and future equipment.

Poor

Missing infrastructure and equipment information.
Fair

Provides general description of hardware, software and connectivity standards and requirements. Although clear, may miss some information elements.
Good

Provides clear and comprehensive description of the capabilities of hardware and learning environments. It identifies minimum standards and requirements for computer hardware, software, and connectivity; describes the types of learning environments that currently exist and those to be created by the plan.
Funding & Budget

Poor

Missing or incomplete funding and budget information or information is vague.
Fair

Provides most, but not all, of the project and budget estimate information. Appears to be generally consistent with plan goals.
Good

Provides a prioritized list of major technology plan projects. Provides budget summary estimate of capital expenses and identifies possible alternative funding resources. Projects, timelines, and budgets are realistic and consistent with plan goals and objectives.
Technical Support/Maintenance

Poor

Missing or vague technical support information.
Fair

Provides adequate but not comprehensive description of technical support requirements and services.
Good

Provides clear and comprehensive requirements and plans for services available and needed to support technology use (network, computer and software support).
Diversity & Equity

Plan for the needs of all students

Poor

Missing Diversity and Equity planning information.
Fair

Plan has recommendations in place to plan for the needs of all students. Funding is not included for equipment.
Good

Plan has recommendations in place to plan for the needs of all students. There is funding in place to purchase any equipment needed for special needs students.
Evaluation

Poor

Missing a plan and forms for evaluation.
Fair

Has some description of an evaluation plan and options for forms stakeholders can use to evaluate.
Good

Has complete description of an evaluation plan and a plan for implementing necessary changes after stakeholders have provided an evaluation.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16