Skip to main content
iRubric: Note-Taking rubric

iRubric: Note-Taking rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Note-Taking 
Students learned some tools for effective note-taking and were given an opportunity to use these skills to take notes on a specific topic when given information.
Rubric Code: R2W5474
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Class note  
Grade Levels: K-5, 9-12

Powered by iRubric TAKING NOTES
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization

Poor

Notes looked like sentences. No space was given between facts. It would be difficult to find information quickly in this.
Fair

Outline of text present. Notes sometimes looked like notes, but sometimes looked like sentences. Little, if any, space is given between facts. It might be difficult to find information in this.
Good

Outline of text present. For the most part, notes looked like notes and not paragraphs. Most information was brief. There was space between facts. It would be fairly easy to find information in this.
Excellent

Outline of text present.Notes looked like notes, rather than paragraphs. There were short blurbs of information, not complete sentences. There was adequate space and grouping between facts. It would be easy and quick to find information in this.
Tools

Poor

Tools such as lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols and/or sketches, and colorwere not used.
Fair

One tool was used (either a list, bullets, abbreviations, symbols, color, or sketches).
Good

Some tools were used, which may have included lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols, color and/or sketches.
Excellent

Several tools were used including lists, bullets, abbreviations, symbols, color, and/or sketches.
Wording

Poor

Information was clearly too lengthy and probably plagiarized. Words were constantly written or repeated unnecessarily. Time was wasted just copying.
Fair

Information was not shortened and may have been plagiarized. Words were unnecessarily written or repeated. Time may have been wasted copying.
Good

Information was sometimes put into "caveman talk" (little words usually omitted; repetition often avoided) or wording was sometimes changed to avoid plagiarism and wasted time.
Excellent

Information was put into "caveman talk" (little words omitted; repetition avoided) or wording was changed to avoid plagiarism and wasted time.
Use of Time

Poor

Notes are too brief. Little information was recorded during time, showing that minutes were wasted.
Fair

Notes are brief. Some information was recorded during time, showing that minutes could have been spent more productively.
Good

Notes are complete. A good amount of information was recorded during time, showing that minutes were spent productively.
Excellent

Notes are plentiful but concise. Lots of information was recorded during time, showing that minutes were spent productively.
Bold terms/Vocabulary

Poor

No bold terms
Fair

Bold terms listed only.
Good

Bold and highlighted words included with some definitions.
Excellent

All Bold and highlighted word included and defined clearly. Easy to find.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16