Skip to main content
iRubric: Essay Rubric

iRubric: Essay Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Essay Rubric 
Rubric Code: QXB8XC2
By sherrysandy
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Rubric for Assessing Essay Question
  Excellent (A)

4 pts

Good (B)

3 pts

Satifactory (C)

2 pts

Weak (D)

1 pts

History

Excellent (A)

Provides a thorough documentation of relevant questions needed in the history inclusive of duration, onset, severity with a justification for asking the questions and support the differential diagnoses.
Good (B)

Provides limited documentation of questions to support the differential diagnoses but includes duration, onset and severity
Satifactory (C)

Provides some questions that are not relevant and unconvincing in significance but includes at least duration, onset or severity
Weak (D)

Much of the questions asked are irrelevant, significance of examination is not shown. Vague descriptions. No connection differential. Neglects to mention duration, onset or severity.
Examination

Excellent (A)

Also given a thorough documentation of key examination findings that include neurological and other systems that would support differential diagnoses.
Good (B)

Provides an almost thorough documentation of the neurological findings but neglects other systems and their relation to the differential diagnoses.
Satifactory (C)

Mentions sketchy parts of the neurological examination findings but does little to convince us of a relationship to differential diagnoses.
Weak (D)

Neglects to mention examination findings or gives a cursory mention without relating to the differential diagnoses.
Diagnosis and Differentials

Excellent (A)

Accurate and defensible, logically deduced. Clear statement of diagnostic criteria used. Strong evidence of critical thinking with respect to the differential diagnosis.
Good (B)

Generally accurate and defensible. Shows a logical trend to how differential diagnosis was arrived but not as thorough or minor flaws in thought process. Solid evidence of analytic thinking.
Satifactory (C)

Differential diagnosis are inappropriately arrived at. Decisions are sometimes difficult to follow. Thought processes are incomplete.
Weak (D)

Many inaccuracies and inconsistencies. No logical process of how differential diagnosis was arrived. No evidence of analytic thinking.
Investigations

Excellent (A)

Documents a thorough list of investigations and rationalizes the need for the investigation and how the outcome will change management
Good (B)

Documents most of the relevant investigations and somewhat indicates the logic in ordering the investigations.
Satifactory (C)

Mentions investigations but does not indicate how investigations would change management
Weak (D)

Neglect to mention the majority of investigations or mentions investigations that are contraindicated and cause more harm
Recommendation of Treatment

Excellent (A)

Provides adequate discussion of all aspects of the case and provides up to date care with possible new insights in management. Takes into account the social aspects of the case and highlights the team approach.
Good (B)

Treatment is generally safe and thorough but no novel management is provided. Team approach and social aspects of the case are considered
Satifactory (C)

Treatment is safe but insufficient as certain aspects are not mentioned.
Weak (D)

Neglects to provide a safe treatment plan or management plan discussed is likely to cause more harm
Literature Evidence

Excellent (A)

Evidence provided is relevant and current. Logical development of evidence. Wide range of citations are provided.
Good (B)

Evidence is current and relevant. Supporting argument is not very well developed. Range of sources and quotes are cited.
Satifactory (C)

Relevant limited evidence is provided.
Weak (D)

Literature is not provided or irrelevant.
Style

Excellent (A)
Good (B)
Satifactory (C)

Adequate use of paragraph structure, grammar, spelling, puntuation, sentence variety.
Weak (D)

Shortcomings in only one of the areas.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98