Skip to main content
iRubric: Brianna Smith participation Self Grading 2018 rubric

iRubric: Brianna Smith participation Self Grading 2018 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Brianna Smith participation Self Grading 2018 
Class participation rubric
Rubric Code: QXB2674
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Participation
  Poor = D

D: Set; Cannot be changed.

1 pts

Fair = C

C: Set; Cannot be changed.

2 pts

Good = B

B: Set; Cannot be changed.

3 pts

My

A: Criteria For Your "A Game". Must build on D,C, and B Criteria.

4 pts

Evidence

At the end of the semester provide evidence to support your score for each category.

(N/A)

Class Attendance
20 %

Poor = D

Missed 3 or more classes
Fair = C

Missed 2 or more classes
Good = B

Missed 1 or more classes
My

Did not miss any classes
Evidence
What Happened During The Week
20 %

Poor = D

Posted 1-2 personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Fair = C

Posted 3-4- personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Good = B

Posted 5-8 personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
My

Posted 9-12 personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observation, etc. in the forums
Evidence
Frequency of Participation
15 %

Poor = D

does not contribute or alternately dominates discussion
Fair = C

Irregularly participates, ONLY OCCASIONALLY
Good = B

initiates questions and comments, regularly participates.
My

initiates questions and comments, engages the class, participates at least once each meeting
Evidence
Group Participation out/in class
10 %

Poor = D

Never met with group
Fair = C

Met with group occasionally and occasionally offered input to group discussion.
Good = B

Present for most group meetings and always contributed to discussion.
My

Present at all group meetings, asks questions to group members, and always contributed to group discussions
Evidence
Outside Of Class Participation
5 %

Poor = D

Never participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Fair = C

Occasionally participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Good = B

Frequently participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
My

Always participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work, etc) outside of class time
Evidence
Questioning
5 %

Poor = D

Makes only statements, "(this is what you should do and how" Does not ask questions.
Fair = C

Asks some questions but makes mostly statements, or leading questions. Already has an answer before asking a question.
Good = B

Asks open ended questions.
When statements are made they are mostly in response to a question. When beginning to make a statement, tries to re-frame the statement into a question.
My

Asks questions without knowing the answer. Turns statements into questions
Evidence
Authenticity
5 %

Poor = D

Makes statement or asks questions only based on what others want to hear. Relates to others as they want and not as self.
Fair = C

Takes into consideration self (feelings, thoughts, opinions, etc,) but continues to only give feedback that conforms to the other.
Good = B

Is beginning to be self-authoring, appearing to others as one appears to oneself.
My

makes statements, gives feedback and asks questions based on ones own feelings and opinions and does not conform to others, while still listening to what those others have to say
Evidence
Preparation
5 %

Poor = D

makes spontaneous but uninformed comments, obvious that required pre-reading not completed.
Fair = C

Comments are informed but lack completeness of comprehensive preparation
Good = B

has read assigned material and relates comments to it
My

has read all assigned materials, contributed to the forum and completed the assignment. says comments that relate directly to the material
Evidence
Originality/creativity
5 %

Poor = D

restatement of readings or comments already offered
Fair = C

Unconventional ideas but may not be well thought out or practical
Good = B

presents novel view, different perspective, original approaches
My

presents a view outside of the given material
Evidence
Articulation
2 %

Poor = D

mispronunciation, poor use of words, poorly organized ideas
Fair = C

Uses jargon, common expressions rather than appropriate technical terms
Good = B

clear and organized use of language, expresses ideas fluently, visual supplements
My

uses words that all can understand to support ideas and to fully explain any visuals supplements used
Evidence
Presentation
2 %

Poor = D

Speaks too softly for all to hear, addreses only the instructor, monotone, upspeak
Fair = C

Inconsistent in presentation, needs reminding,variable style, mannerisms
Good = B

eye contact, address all of class, audible volume, interest & inflection in voice
My

consistent throughout with eye contact, proper speaking volume, and engaging the whole class
Evidence
Vocabulary
2 %

Poor = D

Uses cliche's, mundane vocabulary, uses terms incorrectly
Fair = C

Inconsistent in use of proper terms
Good = B

demonstrates knowledge and accurate use of terms
My

uses terms that make sense in the context of the conversation and shows that they understand the meaning of the terms through their statement
Evidence
Receptive
2 %

Poor = D

defensive, demeans others' comments, talks over them, or disregards feedback
Fair = C

Is respectful and listens, but does not apply feedback
Good = B

accurately listens to and considers feedback from others
My

openly listens to others and uses their feedback to better their views and arguments in the future
Evidence
Inclusion
2 %

Poor = D

does not mention others or further develop ideas previously discussed
Fair = C

Implies contributions of others and bases argument on previous contributions
Good = B

builds on and relates to points made by other contributors,, harmonizes, summarizes, contrasts etc. When referring to others, uses their name.
My

refers to others by their name when building on their points. asks them further questions to gain more insight on their points and encourages them to re-join the conversation
Evidence
Rhetoric
2 %

Poor = D

argues opinion or emotion without evidence
Fair = C

Provides weak or inconsistent evidence or reasoning
Good = B

gives evidence supporting assertions, argues logically, gives examples
My

gives ample evidence when supporting opinions, and logically expresses those opinions
Evidence
Relevance & value
2 %

Poor = D

tangential or pedantic
Fair = C

Contributes on portions or segments, but misses the big picture
Good = B

comments are pertinent to topic and add important facts and perspectives
My

comments and additional facts and perspectives are relevant to the topic. comments have a value to them that students can take away from the discussion
Evidence




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16