Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Opera Critique/Review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Opera Critique/Review
Opera Critique/Review
Rubric for dance class project on opera/use of critique.
Rubric Code:
Q24X2W2
By
Sir_Pat
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Dance
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critique Elements
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Historical Information
Excellent
Exceptionally written, very informative and entertaining, gives detailed historical and/or biographical information on the composer, librettist and/or the history of the opera in the review.
Good
Well-written, mentions most of the biographical and/or historical information on the composer, librettist and/or the history of the opera, and is a mostly informative review.
Fair
Some factual errors exist in the historical and/or biographical information on the composer, librettist and/or the history of the opera, and there is limited information that is presented in the review.
Poor
Poorly written; there are numerous factual errors in the material that is presented, no mention is made of the composer, librettist, and/or the history of the opera itself.
Highlights of the Production
Excellent
Contains a brief summary of the plot WITHOUT giving away the ending. It includes the main characters, performers and major arias discussed in class, as well as the visual aspect of the performance.
Good
Contains a brief summary of the plot WITHOUT giving away the ending, but is missing either discussion of the main characters, performers and/or major arias discussed in class, as well as the visual aspect of the performance.
Fair
Contains a very brief summary of the plot, but gives away the ending. Information on the characters, performers, and/or arias is either missing or extremely limited in nature.
Poor
The summary of the plot is missing entirely. There is no information listed on the characters, performers and/or the arias listened to and discussed in class.
Recommendation
Excellent
The review provides a clear, strong statement of the author's position on the topic, and uses information given in the review to reinforce their position on the topic.
Good
The review provides a mostly clear, strong statement of the author's position on the topic, and uses most information given in the review to reinforce their position on the topic.
Fair
The author's position is apparent, but is not particularly strong or clear. It uses some or limited information presented in order to reinforce their position on the topic.
Poor
The author's position is not clear and does not make sense. It does not use information (or is missing information) presented in order to reinforce their position on the topic.
Creativity
Excellent
Excellent quality and effort are evident in the final product. The review is easy and interesting to read, and offers the reader many interesting points about the performance.
Good
Good quality and effort are evident in the final product. The review is easy to read, and offers a few points of interest to the reader about the performance.
Fair
Adequate quality and effort are in the final product. The review is able to assist the reader but is difficult to follow. The guide could be simplified and begins to show lack of interest for the reader.
Poor
Poor quality and effort are evident in the final product. The guide is not able to be followed, and does not have useful information for the reader to keep their interest.
Spelling/Grammar:
Excellent
The author makes no errors in spelling and/or grammar that will distract the reader from the content presented.
Good
The author makes 1 to 2 errors in spelling and/or grammar that might begin to distract the reader from the content presented.
Fair
The author makes 3 to 4 errors in spelling and/or grammar that begin to distract the reader from the content presented.
Poor
The author makes more than 4 errors in spelling and/or grammar that is distracting the reader from the content presented.
Story Telling Elements
Excellent
The review provides a detailed example of how movement and music communicated and/or helped move the storyline.
Good
The review provides a clear example and has some details of how movement and music communicated and/or helped move the storyline.
Fair
The review provides a few details and/or an unclear example of how movement and music communicated and/or helped move the storyline.
Poor
The review does not provide a detailed example of how movement and music communicated and/or helped move the storyline.
Keywords:
opera, critique
Subjects:
Dance
Music
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Dance rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.