Skip to main content
iRubric: Short Essay/Comparative Analysis rubric

iRubric: Short Essay/Comparative Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Short Essay/Comparative Analysis 
Submit a 3-5 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a Reference page with at least 2 resources used for the paper. Compare and contrast the life, leadership, and philosophy of Gandhi and Dr. King.
Rubric Code: Q23B784
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Comparative Analysis Essay
  Exemplary

10 pts

Average

7 pts

Poor

4 pts

Quality of research

Exemplary

--Cited 2 or more sources.
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Average

--Cited 1 source.
--Source mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis/topic sentence
--Sufficient information provided.
--Research of sufficient depth.
Poor

--Failed to cite sources.
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Information NOT relevant to thesis/topic sentence
--Information provided to support some elements of topic.
--No real research.
Content

Exemplary

--Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Strong & well developed opinion supported with clear evidence.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Average

--Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research.
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Opinion is weak and/or not supported with clear & strong evidence.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Poor

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Support for thesis/topic sentence barely sufficient.
--No opinion nor evidence to support opinion any.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
References

Exemplary

--All sources properly cited in both paper and References page.
--Included at least 3 in-text (or parenthetical) citations in paper.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Average

--All sources properly cited in both paper and References page.
--Included 2 in-text (or parenthetical) citations in paper.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and References page.
-- Failed to include any in-text (or parenthetical) citations in paper.
-- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation.
Grammar and Mechanics

Exemplary

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements.
Average

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements.
Poor

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Plagiarism

reliance upon sources

Exemplary

Student's work is original
- sources cited for direct quotations and summaries
-reliable sources
-does not heavily rely on Wikipedia, or other unreliable sources
Average

Student's work is not original.
- relies on paraphrasing
-sources are not reliable
Poor

Student copies and pastes information with citation.



Keywords:
  • Compa


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98