Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Project
Client Web Site (Site Evaluation)
Participants will have developed a web site for a client based on requirements analysis.
Rubric Code:
Q235CA3
By
Ashiposkar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Computers
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate, Post Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Web Site
unacceptable
0 pts
acceptable
2 pts
Good
4 pts
Exemplary
5 pts
Meets Requirements
unacceptable
Web site does not matches some, but not all requirements.
acceptable
Web site meets all requirements but shows no documented evidence of redundant or unnecessary requirements.
Good
Web site meets all requirements and documents requirements that had to be modified, removed or added.
Exemplary
Web site meets all objectives, documents requirement modified, added or removed as well as any communication with client to discuss requirement modifications.
Use HTML Appropriately
unacceptable
Web site does not pass validation, does not appropriately use HTML constructs. Page likely does not render.
acceptable
Page Renders.<BR>
Web site passes validation, but does not properly use HTML 5 standards. (no doctype, missing meta data). Page may not "look right".
Good
Page Renders, looks right, appropriately uses HTML 5 standards.
Exemplary
All contents of Good AND code is documented and laid out in a clean, easy to read format.
Design Methodology
unacceptable
Partial division of
problem into modules
and inappropriate
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology
not defined properly
acceptable
ï‚·Division of problem
into modules but
inappropriate selection
of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology
not defined properly
Good
ï‚·Division of problem into
modules and good
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology not
properly justified
Exemplary
ï‚·Division of problem into
modules and good
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Appropriate design
methodology and
properly justification
Layout / Design
unacceptable
The web site has a cluttered look and is confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements and page templates have not been utilized.
acceptable
The web site has a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Good
The web site has an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Exemplary
The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout and page templates have been utilized. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Navigation
unacceptable
Some links do not take the reader to the sites/pages described. A user typically feels lost.
acceptable
Links for navigation are the reader where expected, but some needed links seem to be missing or broken. A user sometimes gets lost.
Good
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from page to page and internal links take the reader where he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Exemplary
Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages and take reader where he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Content
unacceptable
Content does not match requirements checklist.
acceptable
Content mostly matches requirements checklist.
Good
Content includes all elements of requirements checklist.
Exemplary
All contents of Good AND
content is arranged in a format and includes features that improve usability of the site.
Work Ethic
unacceptable
Participants does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive to the work of others.
acceptable
Participants usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work. Attendance has poor and attempts to make an effort to make up their work.
Good
Participants usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversations are focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
Exemplary
Participants always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
Functionality
unacceptable
Code will not run. HTML will not display.
acceptable
HTML will display a page but there are small errors.
Good
Web application has consistent look and feel and there are some small errors
Exemplary
Web application has consistent look and feel and most everything works properly.
Database Usages
unacceptable
No database was used in the creation of the site
acceptable
Some Database was used, but there may be bugs/glitches associated with it, such as exception messages appearing on the frontend.
Database normalization has not been attempted, but there may be small problems with repeated rows, insufficient/too many tables, etc
Good
Some Database was used, but there may be bugs/glitches associated with it, such as exception messages appearing on the frontend.
Database normalization has been attempted, but there may be small problems with repeated rows, insufficient/too many tables, etc
Exemplary
Database was used throughout the project, not only for saving user information, but also for storing data such as articles, shop items, etc. There are no problems with queries, no problems are reflected in the front end, and database normalization has been used to ensure the site has clean database layout.
Effectiveness of Presentation
unacceptable
Not prepared
acceptable
Slides were vague and brief concerning the subject.
Good
Seemed prepared; however, was
sometimes vague on the details.
Exemplary
Clearly prepared and thoroughly<BR>
covered each slide, leaving the
class with a clear understanding of
the project.
Documentation
unacceptable
Not prepared
acceptable
Technical documentation covers some aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design
Good
Technical documentation covers most aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design
Exemplary
Technical documentation covers every aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design
Subjects:
Computers
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.