Skip to main content
iRubric: Project rubric

iRubric: Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Participants will have developed a web site for a client based on requirements analysis.
Rubric Code: Q235CA3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Web Site
  unacceptable

0 pts

acceptable

2 pts

Good

4 pts

Exemplary

5 pts

Meets Requirements

unacceptable

Web site does not matches some, but not all requirements.
acceptable

Web site meets all requirements but shows no documented evidence of redundant or unnecessary requirements.
Good

Web site meets all requirements and documents requirements that had to be modified, removed or added.
Exemplary

Web site meets all objectives, documents requirement modified, added or removed as well as any communication with client to discuss requirement modifications.
Use HTML Appropriately

unacceptable

Web site does not pass validation, does not appropriately use HTML constructs. Page likely does not render.
acceptable

Page Renders.<BR>
Web site passes validation, but does not properly use HTML 5 standards. (no doctype, missing meta data). Page may not "look right".
Good

Page Renders, looks right, appropriately uses HTML 5 standards.
Exemplary

All contents of Good AND code is documented and laid out in a clean, easy to read format.
Design Methodology

unacceptable

Partial division of
problem into modules
and inappropriate
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology
not defined properly
acceptable

ï‚·Division of problem
into modules but
inappropriate selection
of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology
not defined properly
Good

ï‚·Division of problem into
modules and good
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Design methodology not
properly justified
Exemplary

ï‚·Division of problem into
modules and good
selection of computing
framework
ï‚·Appropriate design
methodology and
properly justification
Layout / Design

unacceptable

The web site has a cluttered look and is confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements and page templates have not been utilized.
acceptable

The web site has a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Good

The web site has an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Exemplary

The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout and page templates have been utilized. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Navigation

unacceptable

Some links do not take the reader to the sites/pages described. A user typically feels lost.
acceptable

Links for navigation are the reader where expected, but some needed links seem to be missing or broken. A user sometimes gets lost.
Good

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from page to page and internal links take the reader where he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Exemplary

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages and take reader where he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Content

unacceptable

Content does not match requirements checklist.
acceptable

Content mostly matches requirements checklist.
Good

Content includes all elements of requirements checklist.
Exemplary

All contents of Good AND
content is arranged in a format and includes features that improve usability of the site.
Work Ethic

unacceptable

Participants does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive to the work of others.
acceptable

Participants usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work. Attendance has poor and attempts to make an effort to make up their work.
Good

Participants usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversations are focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
Exemplary

Participants always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
Functionality

unacceptable

Code will not run. HTML will not display.
acceptable

HTML will display a page but there are small errors.
Good

Web application has consistent look and feel and there are some small errors
Exemplary

Web application has consistent look and feel and most everything works properly.
Database Usages

unacceptable

No database was used in the creation of the site
acceptable

Some Database was used, but there may be bugs/glitches associated with it, such as exception messages appearing on the frontend.
Database normalization has not been attempted, but there may be small problems with repeated rows, insufficient/too many tables, etc
Good

Some Database was used, but there may be bugs/glitches associated with it, such as exception messages appearing on the frontend.
Database normalization has been attempted, but there may be small problems with repeated rows, insufficient/too many tables, etc
Exemplary

Database was used throughout the project, not only for saving user information, but also for storing data such as articles, shop items, etc. There are no problems with queries, no problems are reflected in the front end, and database normalization has been used to ensure the site has clean database layout.
Effectiveness of Presentation

unacceptable

Not prepared
acceptable

Slides were vague and brief concerning the subject.
Good

Seemed prepared; however, was
sometimes vague on the details.
Exemplary

Clearly prepared and thoroughly<BR>
covered each slide, leaving the
class with a clear understanding of
the project.
Documentation

unacceptable

Not prepared
acceptable

Technical documentation covers some aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design
Good

Technical documentation covers most aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design
Exemplary

Technical documentation covers every aspect standard in the industry
Proper User stories
Proper Test cases
Correct Data flow diagram
Correct Database design




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16