Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Assistant Principal rubric

iRubric: Assistant Principal rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Assistant Principal Assistant Principal Rubric Code: Q227A37 By bhollinger Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Graduate

Interview Committee First Round
	Outstanding 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Vision What would be your first priority in this position?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate not just the vision, but the steps/process required in implementation	Good Candidate is able to communicate the vision, and has some plans for implementation	Fair Candidate has vague vision. and an ambiguous or general plan for implementation	Poor Candidate has vague or ambiguous vision, and no plans for implementation
Instruction In your current position, what is your role in the development or implementation of curriculum?	Outstanding Candidate has extensive experience with making curriculum decisions on a campus or district level	Good Candidate has broad knowledge of curriculum and has experience making decisions regarding focus or calendars	Fair Candidate has limited knowledge of curriculum, mostly in personal classroom, or one specific content area	Poor Candidate has very little knowledge of curriculum
Instruction What instructional strategies would you want new teachers to be sure to employ? And how would you ensure this?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate a variety research-based instructional strategies, and has a specific plan for monitoring and providing continual feedback to new teachers	Good Candidate is able to clearly articulate one or two high-yield research-based instructional strategies, and has a specific plan for monitoring and providing feedback to new teachers	Fair Candidate has only generic strategies to discuss, and uses terms such as "observe" and "discuss" as only means for monitoring and feedback	Poor Candidate is vague, no specific strategies mentioned, no specific means for monitoring new teachers
Manangement How would you encourage a teacher who is discouraged? A student? A parent?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate a complete plan, which includes several different strategies in order to encourage a discouraged teacher/student/parent	Good Candidate is able to articulate different ideas to encourage, but there is no true plan	Fair Candidate is vague and generic or only has one or two ideas they would try	Poor Candidate has no specific ideas for how to encourage a discouraged teacher/student parent
Management When dealing with a discipline problem with a student what is your major concern? Why?	Outstanding Candidate expressed several major concerns, demonstrating an ability to approach the issue from different perspectives, and sufficiently explained why each was a major concern. Candidate articulated function of discipline as something other than punishment	Good Candidate expressed major concerns from more than one perspective, and had adequate explanation for each.	Fair Candidate expressed concerns from more than one perspective, and had some explanation. While not only concern, primary focus is punishment	Poor Candidate expressed concerns from only one perspective, and did not adequately explain why it was a concern. Seemed primarily focused on punishment
Manangement When you observe a teacher who is not performing up to your expectations, what steps do you take to correct that teacher?	Outstanding Candidate is able to identify more than one way in which a teacher may be struggling, and is able to articulate specific, different steps to be taken in each situation	Good Candidate has a specific plan for how to correct a teacher struggling in one specific way, but indicates no need to differentiate based on what skills teacher is struggling with	Fair Candidate is able to express some ideas for each different area of concern, some steps	Poor Candidate is able to express some ideas for how to correct a teacher, but no plan, no differentiation for different areas of concern
Management How do you deal with conflict with another staff member? Among two or more other staff members?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate specific steps to take in order to resolve the core issue, rather than just find a way to deal with it. Has different specific strategies for each situation.	Good Candidate is able to express a specific plan for resolving the conflict, but simply repeats the plan for the second situation	Fair Candidate is able to express several ideas to address the different situations but no real plan	Poor Candidate is able to express one or two ideas for how to address conflict, but does not address the root of the problem
Teamwork How would you develop the team concept with the staff? Students? Community?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate a complete plan, which includes several different strategies in order to develop the team concept with staff/students/community	Good Candidate is able to articulate different ideas, but there is no true plan	Fair Candidate is vague and generic or only has one or two ideas they would try	Poor Candidate has no specific ideas for how to develop a team concept
Teamwork What specific steps would you take to build rapport with your staff? Students? Parents?	Outstanding Candidate presented a detailed outline of specific steps and strategies to build rapport with staff/students/parents	Good Candidate presented some steps to build rapport	Fair Candidate presented ideas, no real steps or plan	Poor Candidate presented limited ideas
Teamwork How would you describe yourself in terms of your ability to work as a member of a team? What role do you usually find yourself in when working in a group?	Outstanding Candidate is able to clearly articulate a his/her role in a team, and describes their role in terms of support for other team members and contribution to the common good outcome	Good Candidate is able to describe his/her teamwork abilities, as well as describe usual role in a group	Fair Candidate uses generic terms when describing role in a group, is able to articulate some ideas about being part of a team	Poor Candidate expresses reluctance or limited experience working in groups, uses in generic terms or "catch phrases" when discussing team work

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98