Skip to main content
iRubric: Image Analysis Case Study rubric

iRubric: Image Analysis Case Study rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Image Analysis Case Study 
Image Analysis Case Study
Rubric for grading case studies for radiographic image analysis.
Rubric Code: PXC8788
By mmcentee
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Case Study Written Report
60% of your case study grade
  level 1

1 pts

level 2

2 pts

level 3

3 pts

level 4

4 pts

level 5

5 pts

Problem Solving

Enter criteria description
level 1

Response is characterized by the following:
• It is blank.
• The student response only repeats information in the problem.
• An incorrect solution/response is given and no other information is shown.
• The solution/response and supportive information is totally irrelevant to the problem task
level 2

An incomplete and/or incorrect response/solution is provided evidencing an attempt to solve the problem. In addition, one or more of the following are apparent:
• The student did consider a constraint or variable of the problem situation.
• The student understands some concepts relevant to the problem task.
• The student selected a totally inappropriate procedure/strategy
level 3

The student selects appropriate strategies to solve this problem; however, the response is not correct because one or more of the following is apparent:
• several misconceptions or has missing several relevant concepts.
• fails to consider several constraints of the problem.
• several irrelevant variables or missing several relevant variables.
• did not carry the strategies far enough to reach a solution.
• no information on how the student arrived at this response/soluti
level 4

The student selects appropriate strategies to solve this problem; however, the response is not entirely correct because one of the following is apparent:
• misconception or missing a relevant concept needed to solve the problem.
• fails to consider a constraint of the problem.
• an irrelevant variable or missing a relevant variable.
• not completely clear how the student arrived at this solution.
level 5

Response is characterized by all of the following:
• The student selects relevant concepts and strategies needed to solve this problem.
• The student considers all constraints of the problem situation.
• The response/solution and all relevant work is correct.
Enter Title
  N/A

0 pts

level 1

1 pts

level 2

2 pts

level 3

3 pts

level 4

4 pts

Grammar/Spelling

N/A

N/A
level 1

Errors make content impossible to understand
level 2

Errors make content difficult to comprehend
level 3

Errors distract somewhat, but content is still generally understandable
level 4

Clear enough to support clear understanding of content
Case Study Report Continued
  N?A

0 pts

N/A

0 pts

level 1

1 pts

level 2

2 pts

Level 3

3 pts

Applying previous knowledge

Integration of knowledge
N?A

N/A
N/A

N/A
level 1

Unable to make connection to previous knowledge. Unwilling to review summaries of prior knowledge for useful information.
level 2

Applies limited amount of prior knowledge to current problem. Does not consistently use information effectively.
Level 3

Effectively applies previous knowledge to current problem. Integrates with new information to assist problem solving process.
Applying previous knowledge

Sharing previous knowledge
N?A

N/A
N/A

N/A
level 1

Works independently. No use of shared of knowledge.
level 2

Some exchange of information and discussion occurs, but do not work consistently to address each one’s needs or understanding.
Level 3

Exchanges information and discusses. Works together to gain knowledge and apply and synthesize information. Respects the opinions of others.
Case Study Discussion Continued
  N/A

0 pts

Level 1

1 pts

Level 2

2 pts

Level 3

3 pts

Level 4

4 pts

Discussion content

N/A

Posts were not relevant and/or did not relate to original post.
Level 1

Post did not add to the discussion only restated the information already posted.
Level 2

Posts added to the discussion but were shallow and did not add much to the discussion.
Level 3

Posts were relevant and added to the discussion. Post examined expanded on what others posted.
Level 4

Posts were relevant and added to the discussion. Post examined the topic beyond what was already posted. Posts stimulated two way discussions through open ended questions. Posts demonstrated critical thinking.
Case Study Discussion
40% of your case study grade
  level 1

0 pts

level 2

0 pts

level 3

1 pts

level 4

2 pts

level 5

3 pts

Discussion involvement

level 1

N/A
level 2

Did not respond to classmates and/or read any post.
level 3

Responded to 1 classmate and/or read 3 or less posts. And/or did not respond to 1 or less responses.
level 4

Responded to 2 classmates and read 4 posts. Respond to 2 responses.
level 5

Responded to 3 classmates and read at least 4 posts. Responded to at least 2 responses.
Discussion Participation

level 1

N/A
level 2

Did not participate through posting and viewing what others had posted. Did not meet minimum requirements.
level 3

Participated but did not meet the minimum posting, replying, and viewing requirements.
level 4

Participated but only met the minimum posting, replying, and viewing requirements.
level 5

Participated by posting, reading, and replying beyond the minimum.



Keywords:
  • Image Analysis, Imaging, Radiology, Radiologic Technology, x-ray, Film analysis, image critique, film critique

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16