Skip to main content
iRubric: Soteriology Paper rubric

iRubric: Soteriology Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Soteriology Paper 
Soteriology Paper
Students write a paper on their view of soteriology in Luke-Acts by evaluating a section in Witherington’s commentary and formulating their own thesis concerning Luke’s soteriology.
Rubric Code: PXBA74B
By RenateHood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Soteriology Paper
  Exceeds

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

Following assignment directions
30 %

Exceeds

The critique of Witherington's evaluation of Luke-Acts soteriology was superbly thorough; and the thesis was written by the student and pertained to the soteriology in Luke-Acts; and the minimal # of scholarly sources and other requirements as explained in the syllabus were used/followed.
Good

The critique of Witherington's evaluation of Luke-Acts soteriology was thorough; and the thesis was written by the student and pertained to the soteriology in Luke-Acts; and the minimal # of scholarly sources and other requirements as explained in the syllabus were used/followed.
Fair

The critique of Witherington's evaluation of Luke-Acts soteriology was fairly thorough; and the thesis was about written by the student and pertained to the soteriology in Luke-Acts in a fair manner; and the minimal # of scholarly sources and other requirements as explained in the syllabus were used/followed mostly.
Poor

The critique of Witherington's evaluation of Luke-Acts soteriology was poor; and the thesis was written by the student and pertained to the soteriology in Luke-Acts in a poor manner; and the minimal # of scholarly sources and other requirements as explained in the syllabus were mostly not used/followed.
Unacceptable

The critique of Witherington's evaluation of Luke-Acts soteriology was lacking or not present at all; and/or the thesis was not written by the student and/or did not pertain to the soteriology in Luke-Acts; and the minimal # of scholarly sources and other requirements as explained in the syllabus were not used/followed; and/or the paper was turned in way late.
Grammar and style
20 %

Exceeds

Excellent grammar, spelling, and punctuation; precise and/or rich language, use of strong verbs and/or appropriate word choices; nearly always sentences are unambiguous and appropriately precise.
Good

Acceptable grammar, spelling, and punctuation; acceptable use of strong verbs and/or acceptable word choices; usually sentences are unambiguous and appropriately precise
Fair

Mediocre grammar, spelling, and punctuation; mediocre use of strong verbs and/or mediocre word choices; often sentences are unambiguous and appropriately precise. But several ambiguities persist.
Poor

Weak grammar, spelling, and punctuation; weak use of strong verbs and/or weak word choices; sometimes sentences are unambiguous and appropriately precise. But too many ambiguities persist.
Unacceptable

Poor grammar, spelling, and punctuation (i.e., no evidence of proofreading). Sentences are insufficiently clear or precise throughout.
Critical thinking
50 %

Exceeds

Nearly always, accurately analyzes the content of the commentary; recognizes poor reasoning of the commentary; clearly formulates a thesis and presents a sound argument
Good

Usually, accurately analyzes the content of the commentary; recognizes poor reasoning of the commentary; fairly clearly formulates a thesis and presents a fairly sound argument
Fair

Often recognizes poor reasoning of the commentary; attempts to formulate a thesis and attempts to present an argument. Several instances of poor analysis or poor reasoning.
Poor

Sometimes recognizes poor reasoning of the commentary; poorly formulates a thesis and presents a poor argument. Too many instances of poor analysis or poor reasoning.
Unacceptable

No thesis/insufficient reasoning/substantiating throughout.



Keywords:
  • Theology paper



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16