iRubric: Bill of Rights Issues Powerpoint rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Bill of Rights Issues Powerpoint

Rubric Code: PX7WW4W

By lsaxton

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Political Science

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	No Credit 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Fulfills requirements	No Credit Does not fulfill requirements	Poor Fewer than 2 of the requirements are met, or a poor effort is made. Does not adequately explain the conflict between rights, or gives a one-sided explanation.	Fair Answers 3-4 of the requirements in a basic manner. Adequately explains both sides of the conflict between rights, but may be uneven.	Good Answers 4-5 of the requirements fairly well. Explains both sides of the conflict between rights in a balanced fashion.	Excellent Thoroughly answers all 5 of the requirements. Explains both sides of the conflict between rights in an excellent and well balanced fashion.
Cases	No Credit Presents no cases	Poor Inaccurate presentation of case(s), or presents only one case without detail, or presents cases that do not apply to the topic	Fair Presents 1-2 cases that fit the topic in some detail and mostly accurately	Good Presents at least 2 cases accurately and in detail	Excellent Detailed analytical presentation of more than 2 cases
Current law	No Credit No information	Poor Brief and inaccurate presentation of current law	Fair Presents current law in some detail and mostly accurately	Good Presents current law accurately and in detail	Excellent Detailed analytical presentation of current law
Tests	No Credit No tests	Poor Attempts to identify tests	Fair Identifies at least one test accurately	Good Identifies tests accurately and in detail	Excellent Detailed analytical presentation of tests
Personal opinion	No Credit Does not identify ho w they would rule	Poor Identifies how they would rule but with no support	Fair Identifies how they would rule with little support	Good Identifies how they would rule with good support	Excellent Identifies in an insightful manner how they would rule with excellent support
Depth	No Credit No research, critical thinking or analysis shown	Poor Little research, critical thinking and analysis	Fair Some research, critical thinking and analysis	Good Good research, critical thinking and analysis - may be uneven or lack depth	Excellent Excellent research, critical thinking and analysis
Understanding of the Bill of Rights	No Credit Does not demonstrate understanding; presents no tests or court cases	Poor Little understanding, significant inaccuracies; presents no tests and no or few court cases	Fair Fair understanding; may be some inaccuracies; may present a test and some court cases	Good Good understanding; few to no inaccuracies; presents more than one test and several court cases and explains their relevance to the question.	Excellent Excellent understanding; all details correct. Presents multiple tests and court cases and explains in detail their relevance to the question.
Presentation	No Credit Does not present	Poor Presentation may be inaudible, mumbled or halting. Students merely read the slides.	Fair Presentation is acceptable. May not be loud enough. Students may merely read slides.	Good Presentation is mostly engaging, with proper volume; some details added that are not shown on slides.	Excellent Presentation is engaging with proper volume. Many details added that are not shown on slides.
Appearance	No Credit No powerpoint	Poor Powerpoint is plain, or no visuals added; poor spelling and grammar	Fair Appearance is fair; some visuals. May have spelling and grammar errors.	Good Good appearance, with many visuals that enhance content. Few spelling and grammar errors.	Excellent Excellent appearance, with many visuals that enhance content. No spelling or grammar errors.
Works Cited	No Credit No works cited.	Poor Incomplete works cited (1-2 sources) with improper form. Sources may be less than reliable.	Fair Incomplete works cited (2-4 sources); form may not be correct. Sources may be less than reliable.	Good Good works cited with 5 reliable sources. Form is mostly correct.	Excellent Excellent works cited with more than 5 reliable sources. Form is correct.

Keywords:

Rights, conflict, supreme court cases

Subjects:

Political Science

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric