Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Mapping Earthquakes-Data Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Mapping Earthquakes-Data Analysis
Mapping Earthquakes-Data Analysis
Rubric Code:
P22B2AX
By
rodenna
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Geology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Mapping Earthquakes-Data Analysis
Level 4
(N/A)
Level 3
(N/A)
Level 2
(N/A)
Level 1
(N/A)
Mapping Earthquakes
Level 4
Map of earthquake was neatly constructed with accuracy and excellent attention to detail. Student clearly plotted the location of each earthquake using a coloured dot and labelled the earthquake magnitude successfully. The ring of fire was shaded on the map and map includes a title and a legend.
Level 3
Map of earthquake was constructed with accuracy and good attention to detail. Student plotted the location of each earthquake using a coloured dot and labelled the earthquake magnitude. The ring of fire was shaded on the map and map includes a title and a legend.
Level 2
Map of earthquake was constructed with some errors and little attention to detail. Student plotted the location of the earthquakes using a dot and labelled the earthquake magnitude inconsistently. The ring of fire was shaded on the map and map includes a title and a legend are missing or have some misconceptions.
Level 1
Map of earthquakes was constructed with many errors and lacks detail. Student plotted the location of some of the earthquakes using dots and labelled the earthquake magnitude with several errors and ommisions. The ring of fire, map title, and legend are missing or is completed wrong.
Content/Analysis
Level 4
A strong, thoughtful, meaningful analysis of the data collected and the background research is provided. Predictions are logical and fit with the data collected. All or most questions listed in the assignment instructions are well answered.
Work is original and information is well synthesized, demonstrating a clear, and strong understanding of all the gathered information.
Level 3
A well-thought out analysis of the data collected and the background research is provided. Predictions are fairly logical and fit with the data collected. All or most questions listed in the assignment instructions are answered.
Work is original and information is synthesized appropriately, demonstrating a clear understanding of all the gathered information.
Level 2
An analysis of the data collected and the background research is provided, though somewhat shallow. Predictions are made, however strong connections to the collected data are lacking. Some of the questions listed in the assignment instructions are answered.
Work is somewhat original, not well synthesized. It is somewhat incoherent.
Level 1
Analysis of data is poor, very brief or altogether nonexistent. Only a brief summary of the data is provided. There are severely weak or no predictions altogether. Several questions listed in the assignment instructions are left unanswered.
Work is unoriginal and not well synthesized. It is incoherent.
Writing style and conventions
Level 4
Writing is sophisticated and eloquent. Word choice is exceptional and varied. Sentence variety and fluency are also excellent.There are few to no spelling or grammatical errors. The composition is overall very captivating to read.
Level 3
The composition is fairly well written and fluent. Word choice is varied. There are a few spelling and/or grammatical errors. Some sentence variety exists. The composition is fairly interesting to read.
Level 2
The composition is comprehensible, with some varied word choice. Sentence structure is minimally varied. There are some spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Level 1
The composition is bland and/or confusing. Word choice is unvaried and unsophisticated. Sentence structure is simple and unvaried. There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Subjects:
Geology
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.