- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC This rubric will evaluate the quality of the opening/closing statement written, questions developed, and reflection. Rubric Code: NXA4XB7 By Eliztorres Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Class Part./Att.
	ADVANCED 10 pts	PROFICIENT 8 pts	EMERGING 4 pts	BELOW 2 pts	Student/Teacher Score (N/A)
Preparation	ADVANCED Strong evidence of student research in the OPENING STATEMENT. There were at least 2 quotes from used to validate the claim	PROFICIENT Some evidence of student research in the OPENING STATEMENT. There was at least 1 quote to validate the claim	EMERGING Little to no evidence of student research in the OPENING STATEMENT. There was NO QUOTE used to validate the claim.	BELOW No evidence of research.	Student/Teacher Score
Storytelling	ADVANCED Storytelling was extremely clear and easy to align with the claim.	PROFICIENT Storytelling was good and aligned with the claim.	EMERGING . The Storytelling was all over the place,and I had a hard time aligning it with the claim.	BELOW No evidence of resolution.	Student/Teacher Score
The Dispute	ADVANCED Student was explicitly clear of what is being disputed. They were strong in their support of their position. No "cut and paste" job here. They used their own words to explain the dispute.	PROFICIENT There was evidence of what was being disputed, but it could have been clearer. They were somewhat strong in their support of their position, but could have done more. No cut and paste.	EMERGING Student was unclear of what was being disputed. They were weak in their support of their position. They merely read and it appeared to be a "cut and paste" job and not their own words.	BELOW No evidence of dispute.	Student/Teacher Score
Anticipate Opposition(Counterclaim)	ADVANCED Student identified an anticipated argument from the opposition. Student offered a solution to that argument, and it was clear and to the point.	PROFICIENT Student identified and anticipated argument from the opposition, but did not follow completely through with a solution to that argument. It was a slight disconnect.	EMERGING The student NEVER identified and anticipated argument from the opposition. Student offered no solutions to any arguments that may counter him or her.	BELOW No evidence of anticipated argument.	Student/Teacher Score