Skip to main content
iRubric: OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC

iRubric: OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC 
OPENING STATEMENT RUBRIC
This rubric will evaluate the quality of the opening/closing statements adn the presentation of those statements.
Rubric Code: NXA23AC
By advocacyprof
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Class Part./Att.
  ADVANCED

10 pts

PROFICIENT

8 pts

EMERGING

4 pts

BELOW

2 pts

Storytelling

ADVANCED

The Resolution was repeated at least 2 times in the Opening Statement.
Storytelling was extremely clear and easy to align with the Resolution.
PROFICIENT

The Resolution was mentioned at least 1 time during the Opening Statement. Storytelling was good and aligned with the Resolution.
EMERGING

The Resolution was NEVER mentioned during the Opening Statement. The Storytelling was all over the place,and I had a hard time aligning it with the Resolution.
BELOW

No evidence of resolution.
The Dispute

ADVANCED

Student was explicitly clear of what is being disputed. They were strong in their support of their position. No "cut and paste" job here. They used their own words to explain the dispute.
PROFICIENT

There was evidence of what was being disputed, but it could have been clearer. They were somewhat strong in their support of their position, but could have done more. No cut and paste.
EMERGING

Student was unclear of what was being disputed. They were weak in their support of their position. They merely read and it appeared to be a "cut and paste" job and not their own words.
BELOW

No evidence of dispute.
Definition of Words

ADVANCED

Student defined at least 2 or more words in the Opening Statement and did not assume anything. The definitions helped me to follow the storytelling.
PROFICIENT

Students defined at least 1 word in the Opening Statement. I wondered about a few of the words they were using, because I was unsure if they understood their meaning.
EMERGING

Student gave ZERO definitions in their Opening Statement. They used words that I know they did not understand, and they assumed I did know. No effort to define was given.
BELOW

No evidence of definition.
Anticipate Opposition

ADVANCED

Student identified an anticipated argument from the opposition. Student offered a solution to that argument, and it was clear and to the point.
PROFICIENT

Student identified and anticipated argument from the opposition, but did not follow completely through with a solution to that argument. It was a slight disconnect.
EMERGING

The student NEVER identified and anticipated argument from the opposition. Student offered no solutions to any arguments that may counter him or her.
BELOW

No evidence of anticipated argument.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98