Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: GROUP WORK- a 15 Minute Short (narrative film) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
GROUP WORK- a 15 Minute Short (narrative film)
GROUP WORK- a 10 Minute Short (narrative film)
The final version of the script, storyboard, shot list and production schedule are to be submitted with the final version of the video. However the students will be required to present the working versions of the documents before shooting their narrative film.
Rubric Code:
MXAC323
By
malolitasabuelo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
15-Minute Short Film
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Script
Excellent
Complete script for entire film turned in by deadline. Includes all dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes.
Good
Complete script for entire film turned in close to deadline. Includes most dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes.
Fair
Partial script or missed deadline. Missing significant amount of dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and/or technical notes.
Poor
Did not turn in script at all or what was turned in cannot be called a film
Storyboards/Shot List/ Schedule
Excellent
Complete set of storyboard covering all of the scenes, a schedule and shot list for entire film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for entire film.
Good
Complete set of storyboards for entire film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for entire film.
OR
Set of storyboards for majority of film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for majority of film.
Fair
Only storyboards, schedule, OR shot list turned in.
Poor
No storyboards. No shot list. No schedule turned in
Editing
Excellent
All the shots enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.
Shots are sequenced in a coherent way.
Transitions and cuts are well executed.
Special effects and graphics are appropriate and enhance the story
Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are all of an exceptional technical standard and enhance the film
Transitions and cuts are well executed
Credits are comprehensiv
Good
Most of the shots included in the edit enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.
Shots are mostly sequenced in a manner that helps to tell the story in a coherent way.
Transitions and cuts are executed well for the most part
Special effects and graphics are mostly appropriate but there are instances where they do not help to enhance the story
Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a high standard
Fair
Only some of the shots edited enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.
Shots are not sequenced in a coherent way in several instances
Transitions and cuts are not executed well in several instances
Special effects and graphics are mostly inappropriate but there are instances where they do help to enhance the story
Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a high standard for the most part
Poor
Shots are not sequenced in a logical manner that helps to tell the story.
The edit is largely incoherent with only some instances of good edits
Transitions and cuts are poorly executed or not used when needed
Special effects and graphics are mostly inappropriate and do nothing to enhance the story
Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a low technical standard or are inappropriate
Plot/Dramatic Structure
Excellent
Plot has clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure builds to climax, then ends with falling action.
Good
Plot has mostly clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure is generally followed, but wanders in places. Climax of story is clear.
Fair
Plot is difficult to follow, and lacks either a clear beginning, middle, or end. Dramatic structure is only somewhat followed, and actions seem random.
Poor
The plot is not evident. Instead there is a collection of random actions with nothing tying them together.
Character Development
Excellent
All characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Clear protagonist and antagonist.
Good
Most characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Main characters are clear, but their roles in the story may not be.
Fair
Some characters are developed, but at least half are just people on the screen. It is unclear whose story the film is telling
Poor
Everyone who appears on screen is immediately forgettable. No real character development to speak of.
Keywords:
short film, performance output, group work
Subjects:
Communication
English
Humanities
Vocational
Types:
Project
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.