iRubric: Digital Security Project rubric

Content lacks a central theme, clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Much of the supporting information is irrelevant to the overall message. The viewer is unsure what the message is because there is little persuasive information and only one or two facts about the topic are articulated. Information is incorrect, out of date, or incomplete.

The content does not present a clearly stated theme, is vague, and some of the supporting information does not seem to fit the main idea or appears as a disconnected series of scenes with no unifying main idea

Information is presented as a connected theme with accurate, current supporting information that contributes to understanding the project’s main idea. Details are logical and persuasive information is effectively used.

The content includes a clear statement of purpose or theme and is creative, compelling and clearly written. A rich variety of supporting information in the video contributes to the understanding of the project’s main idea.

Tone and voice rarely convey emotions or enthusiasm. Recording is unclear and/or not loud enough to be heard. Background sounds and effects absent or distract from the message.

Tone and voice frequently convey emotions or enthusiasm. Most of the recording is clear and loud enough to be heard. Background sounds and effects sometimes distract from the message.

Tone and voice frequently convey emotions and enthusiasm. The recording is clear and loud enough to be heard. Background sounds and effects usually blend with the message.

Tone and voice convey emotions and enthusiasm. The recording is clear and loud enough to be heard. Background sounds and effects blend with the message.

Student does not cite resources or uses information or data from one unreliable source.

Student uses information and data from two or more sources, but one or more are not reputable. One or more sources are not cited or are incorrectly cited

Student uses information and data from only one reputable source. Source is cited correctly.

Student uses information and data from two or more reputable sources. All sources are cited correctly.

Meetings were not held and/or some of the team members did not contribute at all to the project. Low levels of respect were evident within the team.

Only a couple of team meetings were held. Most of the students on the team contributed at some level, but a majority of the work was done by one or two.

Students met and had discussions regularly. Most of the students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members mostly showed respect with each other.

Student met and had discussions regularly. All students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members showed respect with each other.