Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: DID/SYBIL Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
DID/SYBIL Project
Human Body Systems Project
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your DID Project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Technology presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your presentation have been represented and all other criteria have been met.
Rubric Code:
MX9B8B7
By
j3texans
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Health
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Grading Rubric
Excellent
100 pts
Good
80 pts
Fair
70 pts
Poor
50 pts
UNACCEPTABLE
0 pts
Content On DID
15 %
Excellent
Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. DID is extensively explained. Appropriate title is given.
Good
Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Appropriate title is given.
Fair
Topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.Appropriate title is given.
Poor
Topic is mentioned, but no details were given and/or no appropriate title is given.
UNACCEPTABLE
NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED
Information on Sybil
15 %
Excellent
Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 6 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Good
Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 5 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Fair
Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.A minimum of 4 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Poor
Topic is minimally discussed to include minimum of 3 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
UNACCEPTABLE
less than 2 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Information on another Individual
15 %
Excellent
Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 6 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Good
Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 5 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Fair
Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.A minimum of 4 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Poor
Topic is minimally discussed to include minimum of 3 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
UNACCEPTABLE
less than 2 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Comparison/Contrast.
15 %
Excellent
Extensive comparison/contrast between chosen individuals,
Good
Comparison/Contrast between individuals is somewhat discussed but more explanation is needed,
Fair
Comparison/contrast is slightly discussed but more information is needed.
Poor
Minimally comparison/contrast is provided.
UNACCEPTABLE
NO COMPARISON/CONTRAST IS PROVIDED
Technology Product used
20 %
Excellent
Technology app is advanced (list provided in Instructions). Text is easy to read. Colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 4-5 graphics/charts are added per person or for a total of 8-10. 2 applications are embedded within this product (1 per disease).
Good
Technology selected is average(list provided in Instructions) . Text is easy to read. Black and white colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 2-3 graphics per person or for a total of 4-6, and only One additional application is embedded within.
Fair
Technology selected is minimally different than Power Point or not approved in advance. Little effort put into enhancing visual.
4-6 graphics and/or 0 applications are included
Poor
Technology used is powerpoint or Google slide. Visuals are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great or too small for the space provided. No visual appeal. less than 2 graphics and/or 0 applications
UNACCEPTABLE
NO TECHNOLOGY PRODUCT PROVIDED
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %
Excellent
There are no misspelled words within the product.
Good
There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.
Fair
There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.
Poor
There are many misspelled words within the product.
UNACCEPTABLE
CANNOT MAKE SENSE OF SENTENCES
Sources cited
10 %
Excellent
Sources used in project correctly cited for each graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Good
Sources used in project correctly cited for most graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Fair
Sources used in project correctly cited for some graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Poor
Sources used in project Incorrectly cited for few graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
UNACCEPTABLE
Information presented was all cut and pasted (graphics allowed)
Keywords:
DID?Sybil Rubric
Subjects:
Computers
English
Health
History
Science
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.