Skip to main content
iRubric: DID/SYBIL Project rubric

iRubric: DID/SYBIL Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
DID/SYBIL Project 
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your DID Project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Technology presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your presentation have been represented and all other criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: MX9B8B7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

80 pts

Fair

70 pts

Poor

50 pts

UNACCEPTABLE

0 pts

Content On DID
15 %

Excellent

Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. DID is extensively explained. Appropriate title is given.
Good

Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Appropriate title is given.
Fair

Topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.Appropriate title is given.
Poor

Topic is mentioned, but no details were given and/or no appropriate title is given.
UNACCEPTABLE

NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED
Information on Sybil
15 %

Excellent

Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 6 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Good

Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 5 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Fair

Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.A minimum of 4 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Poor

Topic is minimally discussed to include minimum of 3 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
UNACCEPTABLE

less than 2 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Information on another Individual
15 %

Excellent

Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 6 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Good

Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 5 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Fair

Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.A minimum of 4 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Poor

Topic is minimally discussed to include minimum of 3 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
UNACCEPTABLE

less than 2 items of information, including but not limited to, real name, occupation, treatment plan including what treatment is still ongoing, etc .
Comparison/Contrast.
15 %

Excellent

Extensive comparison/contrast between chosen individuals,
Good

Comparison/Contrast between individuals is somewhat discussed but more explanation is needed,
Fair

Comparison/contrast is slightly discussed but more information is needed.
Poor

Minimally comparison/contrast is provided.
UNACCEPTABLE

NO COMPARISON/CONTRAST IS PROVIDED
Technology Product used
20 %

Excellent

Technology app is advanced (list provided in Instructions). Text is easy to read. Colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 4-5 graphics/charts are added per person or for a total of 8-10. 2 applications are embedded within this product (1 per disease).
Good

Technology selected is average(list provided in Instructions) . Text is easy to read. Black and white colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 2-3 graphics per person or for a total of 4-6, and only One additional application is embedded within.
Fair

Technology selected is minimally different than Power Point or not approved in advance. Little effort put into enhancing visual.
4-6 graphics and/or 0 applications are included
Poor

Technology used is powerpoint or Google slide. Visuals are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great or too small for the space provided. No visual appeal. less than 2 graphics and/or 0 applications
UNACCEPTABLE

NO TECHNOLOGY PRODUCT PROVIDED
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %

Excellent

There are no misspelled words within the product.
Good

There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.
Fair

There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.
Poor

There are many misspelled words within the product.
UNACCEPTABLE

CANNOT MAKE SENSE OF SENTENCES
Sources cited
10 %

Excellent

Sources used in project correctly cited for each graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Good

Sources used in project correctly cited for most graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Fair

Sources used in project correctly cited for some graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Poor

Sources used in project Incorrectly cited for few graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
UNACCEPTABLE

Information presented was all cut and pasted (graphics allowed)



Keywords:
  • DID?Sybil Rubric







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16