- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Student Review Section (China) rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Student Review Section (China) questions to review the incidents towards the end of chapter question 1:demonstrate topic understanding question 2:Compare/contrast question 3:Demonstrate information analysis and understanding Rubric Code: MB6A6A By HexMartinez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Homework Grade Levels: 9-12

Homework
	does not meet standar 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Question 1	does not meet standar Fails to meet minimum criteria in all or most categories.	Poor Minimal relevant facts included; narrowly detailed; lacking in focus. Limited comprehension of the question. Inadequate historical evidence offered; accuracy questionable. Very little evidence of analysis.	Fair Limited detail and/or accurate facts; uneven focus. Somewhat narrow comprehension of the question. Little historical support or evidence demonstrated. Implicit evaluation of perspectives and interpretations	Good Sufficient relevant facts and details included; adequately focused and accurate. Adequate comprehension of the demands of the question. Most claims historically supportable; evidence mainly implicit. Explicit and implicit evaluation of perspectives and interpretations.
Questoion 2	does not meet standar Fails to meet minimum criteria in all or most categories	Poor does not properly compare/contrast information presenten is minimal relevant to the facts. Inadequate historical evidence offered; accuracy questionable. Very little evidence of analysis.	Fair an attempt to compare and contrast. Somewhat narrow comprehension of the question. Little historical support or evidence demonstrated. Implicit evaluation of perspectives and interpretations	Good Sufficient relevant facts and details included; adequately focused and accurate. Adequate comprehension of the demands of the question.
Question 3	does not meet standar Fails to meet minimum criteria in all or most categories.	Poor Minimal relevant facts included; narrowly detailed; lacking in focus. Limited comprehension of the question. Inadequate historical evidence offered; accuracy questionable. Very little evidence of analysis.	Fair Limited detail and/or accurate facts; uneven focus. Somewhat narrow comprehension of the question. Little historical support or evidence demonstrated. Implicit evaluation of perspectives and interpretations	Good Sufficient relevant facts and details included; adequately focused and accurate. Adequate comprehension of the demands of the question. Most claims historically supportable; evidence mainly implicit. Explicit and implicit evaluation of perspectives and interpretations.