Skip to main content
iRubric: Discussion Board Forum Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Board Forum Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Board Forum Rubric 
Rubric Code: M2282A3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Discussion Board Forum
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Critical Analysis

Poor

Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or "I agree" or "Great idea," without supporting statements with concepts from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application.
Fair

Discussion postings repeat and summarize basic, correct information, but do not link readings to outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application and do not consider alternative perspectives or connections between ideas. Sources are not cited.
Good

Discussion postings display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology and proper citation.
Excellent

Discussion postings display an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation and meets the minimum word requirement.
Participation in Learning Community

Poor

Discussion postings do not contribute to ongoing conversations or respond to peers' postings. There is no evidence of replies to questions.
Fair

Discussion postings sometimes contribute to ongoing conversations as evidenced by
— affirming statements or references to relevant research or,
— asking related questions or,
— making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research.
Good

Discussion postings contribute to the class' ongoing conversations as evidenced by
— affirming statements or references to relevant research or,
— asking related questions or,
— making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research.
Excellent

Discussion postings contribute to the class' ongoing conversations as evidenced by affirming statements or references to relevant research or, asking related questions or, making an oppositional statement with supporting evidence.
Discussion postings actively stimulate and sustain further discussion by building on peers' responses including building a focused argument around a specific issue or asking a new related question or making an oppositional statement supported by evidence
Etiquette in Dialogue with Peers

Poor

Written interactions on the discussion board show disrespect for the viewpoints of others.
Fair

Some of the written interactions on the discussion board show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Good

Written interactions on the discussion board show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Excellent

Written interactions on the discussion board show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political and religious beliefs.
Quality of Writing

Poor

Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication.
Fair

Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
Good

Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.
Excellent

Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
Response to Colleagues

Poor

No additional response to others in the class; or response is simplistic with little to no extension to learning of others
Fair

Response are minimal in number (1), and provide some insightful thought into the discussion; however, lacks justification to support extended learning
Good

Responses are few in quantity (1-2), extend learning of others by providing an opposing or supporting view; includes adequate justification
Excellent

Response are great (3 or more) and provide additional supporting evidence of student learning through conversations between colleagues.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98