Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Discussion Board Forum Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Discussion Board Forum Rubric
Discussion Board Forum Rubric
Rubric Code:
M2282A3
By
Alan_Siegel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Reading
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Discussion Board Forum
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Critical Analysis
Poor
Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or "I agree" or "Great idea," without supporting statements with concepts from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application.
Fair
Discussion postings repeat and summarize basic, correct information, but do not link readings to outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application and do not consider alternative perspectives or connections between ideas. Sources are not cited.
Good
Discussion postings display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology and proper citation.
Excellent
Discussion postings display an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation and meets the minimum word requirement.
Participation in Learning Community
Poor
Discussion postings do not contribute to ongoing conversations or respond to peers' postings. There is no evidence of replies to questions.
Fair
Discussion postings sometimes contribute to ongoing conversations as evidenced by
— affirming statements or references to relevant research or,
— asking related questions or,
— making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research.
Good
Discussion postings contribute to the class' ongoing conversations as evidenced by
— affirming statements or references to relevant research or,
— asking related questions or,
— making an oppositional statement supported by any personal experience or related research.
Excellent
Discussion postings contribute to the class' ongoing conversations as evidenced by affirming statements or references to relevant research or, asking related questions or, making an oppositional statement with supporting evidence.
Discussion postings actively stimulate and sustain further discussion by building on peers' responses including building a focused argument around a specific issue or asking a new related question or making an oppositional statement supported by evidence
Etiquette in Dialogue with Peers
Poor
Written interactions on the discussion board show disrespect for the viewpoints of others.
Fair
Some of the written interactions on the discussion board show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Good
Written interactions on the discussion board show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Excellent
Written interactions on the discussion board show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political and religious beliefs.
Quality of Writing
Poor
Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication.
Fair
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
Good
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.
Excellent
Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
Response to Colleagues
Poor
No additional response to others in the class; or response is simplistic with little to no extension to learning of others
Fair
Response are minimal in number (1), and provide some insightful thought into the discussion; however, lacks justification to support extended learning
Good
Responses are few in quantity (1-2), extend learning of others by providing an opposing or supporting view; includes adequate justification
Excellent
Response are great (3 or more) and provide additional supporting evidence of student learning through conversations between colleagues.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Reading
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.