iRubric: Fallacies of Argument Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Fallacies of Argument Presentation Rubric

Fallacies of Argument Prezi Presentation Rubric

Each goupr was to create a presentation using any method on an assigned loggical fallacy. This presentation must be professional, creative, engaging to the rest of the class, and address the assigned content.

Rubric Code: LXX399X

By dbkillen

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Philosophy

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 6-8

Presentation Rubric
	Unsatisfactory 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	Exemplary 4 pts
Content	Unsatisfactory The presentation does not address the correct content that was assigned. There is no evidence of research on topic.	Satisfactory The presentation addresses most of the content that was assigned. Some crucial details are left out of the presentation. There is evidence of research on the topic assigned.	Excellent The presentation addresses all of the content that was assigned. There is evidence of thorough research done on the topic.	Exemplary The presentation goes beyond just addressing all of the content that was assigned. There is evidence of thorough research done on this practice, and it is clearly outlined and shown to the entire class.
Creativity	Unsatisfactory The presentation shows no effort to be creative. The presentation does not engage the class in the material being presented. Sections are very mundane, and there are no pictures or videos in the presentation.	Satisfactory The presentation is somewhat creative. There are aspects of the presentation that are creative, but the presentation overall does not engage the class as a whole. Sections may be either mundane, or too distracting to the audience from the content. There are only a few pictures.	Excellent The presentation is very creative, and it engages the class as a whole. The presentation includes pictures and/or videos. The sections are creative and interesting to the class.	Exemplary The presentation is very creative, and it engages the class as a whole. The presentation includes pictures and videos that enhance the understanding of the concepts presented. The sections are creative and inspire the class to discussion.
Clarity and Neatness	Unsatisfactory Presentation is barely legible and one cannot tell what goes where. It would be impossible to understand the presentation without asking a lot of questions. Little to no use of color or wise use of space. Extremely sloppy.	Satisfactory Presentation is difficult to read with rough pictures and labels. It would be difficult to understand the presentation without asking a lot of questions. Adequate use of color and spacing.	Excellent Presentation is easy to read and most elements are clearly written, labeled, or pictured. It is understandable without having to ask a lot of questions. Good use of color and space but looks hurried.	Exemplary Presentation reads naturally and all elements are clearly written, labeled, or pictured. It is understandable without having to ask questions. Amazing use of color and space, neat in appearance.
Organization	Unsatisfactory Group was very unorganized and not well rehearsed. Presentation was delayed and the groups did not discuss their speaking parts.	Satisfactory Presentation seems a bit unorganized, some flaws were apparent. Presentations were delayed a bit and note every member participated in speaking.	Excellent Presentation appeared organized, though some minor flaws were apparent. Presentations were note delayed and each member took part in speaking.	Exemplary Presentations appeared to be extremely organized and have not flaws in delivery. Presentations were note delayed and each member knew their speaking part.
Group Cohesiveness / Time Magangeme	Unsatisfactory Groups did not work well together. The work was not divided fairly and certain members did not participate. Arguments arose. the groups did not use their time wisely or focus on the task at hand. Presentation failed to fill the class period.	Satisfactory Groups worked well together, though the work was not divided fairly. Certain members did not participate. No arguments arose. Groups use a portion of the time wisely but struggled to focus on the task at hand. Presentation filled at least half the class period.	Excellent Groups worked well together and divided the work, though it may have been unfair or disproportionate. Certain members may have not been responsible for certain portions of the project. No arguments arose. The group remained focused and used their time wisely. Presentation mostly filled the class period.	Exemplary Groups worked well together and divided the work fairly. Each member was responsible for a portion of the project and no arguments arose. Group stayed focused and used their time wisely. Presentation filled the class period.
Grammar/Spelling Title	Unsatisfactory There are many grammatical/spelling errors that greatly distract viewers from the content of the presentation.	Satisfactory There are some grammatical/spelling errors that distract viewers from the content presented in the presentation.	Excellent There are almost no grammatical/spelling errors that do not distract viewers from the content presented in the presentation. The presentation is mostly professional.	Exemplary The presentation had no grammatical/spelling errors. The presentation as a whole is very professional, and does not distract viewers away from the content of the presentation.

Keywords:

Presentation;

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric