Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Engneering Notebook Rubric

iRubric: Engneering Notebook Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Engneering Notebook Rubric Engineering Notebook - PLTW IED A rubric for assessing the student's engineering notebook Rubric Code: LXC8W83 By ArohiV Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

PLTW Engineering Notebook
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts
Table of Contents	Excellent Table of contents accurately represents all of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are listed for each entry.	Good Table of contents represents most of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are occasionally missing. Entries are fairly neat and legible.	Fair able of contents has only occasional entries. Page numbers and/or dates are missing. Entries are barely legible.	Needs Improvement No Table of contents exists/No entries in the Table of contents
Page Titles/Objective	Excellent Page titles are accurately displayed at the top of each page. Titles clearly identify content of each page. Objective clearly written and dated. Entries are neat and legible.	Good Page titles are displayed at the top of each page, but are occasionally missing/inaccurate. Objective fairly clear and dated, however it could use more detail. Entries are fairly neat and legible.	Fair An attempt at page titles is present but inaccurate. Frequent omissions occur. Objective is weak and missing most of the details. Dates may be missing. Entries are barely legible.	Needs Improvement Page titles are missing. Objective is missing. Not dated.
Notebook Entries	Excellent All entries are consistently done in permanent blue or black ink. All entries, figures and calculation are labeled clearly and consistently. Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated.	Good Most entries are done in blue or black permanent ink. Most entries, figures, and calculations are labeled. Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated. Occasional errors are evident	Fair Entries are frequently done in pencil and only occasionally done in permanent ink. An attempt at labeling entries, figures and calculations is evident. Dates are inconsistently listed at the beginning of entries, if at all	Needs Improvement Entries are always done in pencil. No attempt is evident at dating entries and diagram titles.
Added Items	Excellent Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are written in ink over the edge of the item.	Good Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are missing over the edge of the item.	Fair Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed, but are done sloppily and with little care.	Needs Improvement Items are not permanently affixed to the notebook. OR Items are done sloppily.
Mistakes/Unused Space	Excellent Mistakes and errors are consistently lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is consistently X'd or lined out and a signature is present.	Good Mistakes and errors are lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is X'd or lined out and a signature is present. Occasional errors of omission are present.	Fair Mistakes and errors are inconsistently or improperly lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is occasionally X'd or lined out and a signature is sometimes present. Errors of omission are frequent.	Needs Improvement Clear evidence exists where items have been erased or scribbled out. Unused space is evident without being X'd or lined out.
Pages signed, dated and witnessed	Excellent Pages are consistently signed and dated by the designer. Witness signatures and dates are also consistently displayed. No errors are evident.	Good Pages are signed and dated by the designer and witness. Occasionally errors of omission by the designer or witness are present.	Fair Some evidence exists that signatures have been attempted by both the designer and witness' Frequent lapses and errors of omission are present.	Needs Improvement No evidence is present that either the designer or a witness has signed and dated pages.
Content
Engineering Process	Excellent Shows a clear understanding of where the project is in the engineering process: Question - Design - Build - Test - Redesign - Test, etc. Supported by notes, data and summaries.	Good Shows some understanding of where the project is in the engineering process, may not show full testing, but some exists or is vague (It is great, it didn't work, etc) Supported by notes, data and summaries.	Fair Engineering process is referenced, but not supported completely by notes, summaries, or data	Needs Improvement Engineering process is not clearly followed. Or the notebook is a simple log of daily activities without connection or process.
Daily Tasks	Excellent Tasks are listed for each day and are achievable and specific	Good Tasks are listed for each day and are specific	Fair Tasks are listed for each day, but may be somewhat vague	Needs Improvement Tasks are vague, overly simple, or missing
Notes	Excellent Notes paint a clear picture of how the class period was used and matches the tasks and summary. Aligns with the data listed	Good Notes paint a clear picture of how the class period was used, linked to the tasks and summary or to the data	Fair Notes give a general view of how the day was used. May not clearly connect to the daily tasks, summary or data specifically.	Needs Improvement Notes are vague, overly simple, or missing
Design/Sketches	Excellent All sketches and pictures are complete and clearly labeled with descriptions.	Good Sketches are complete but inconsistently or not clearly labeled.	Fair Sketches have drawings however incomplete information like Heading information and important identification of components and/or description is incomplete or inaccurate.	Needs Improvement Sketches are missing or not complete.
Grading
Grade	Excellent	Good	Fair	Needs Improvement

Keywords:

engineering notebook

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16