Skip to main content
iRubric: Occupational Therapy Case Study rubric

iRubric: Occupational Therapy Case Study rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Occupational Therapy Case Study 
Occupational Therapy Case Study
Evaluation of students written intervention plan based on analysis of provided assessment results, planning, interventions, and demonstrating use of EBP
Rubric Code: LXACC23
By hrobertson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric OT Case Study
  Poor

40 pts

Fair

80 pts

Good

100 pts

Analysis of Assessment Results
25 %

Specific tools or instruments that are used during the OT evaluation process; Analysis of client's assets and problems or potential problems are specifically identified through assessment tools designed to observe, measure and inquire about factors that support or hinder occupational performance.
Poor

Analysis is incomplete. Remedial incorporation of OT Framework.
Fair

Analysis complete, but a sketch; more detail is needed. Good incorporation of OT Framework.
Good

Analysis is entirely complete: occupational profile, medical history, presenting problem, medications, precautions, contraindications,client factors, performance skills, performance patterns, and contexts are included. Thoughtful and thorough use of OT Framework.
Planning
25 %

There is evidence of student's obtaining and interpreting relevant evidence necessary for intervention planning; demonstrates clarity in the presentation of problems and functional implications relevant to the setting; demonstrates attention to client centered practice, collaboration, and culture. Goals are relevant, measurable, and written appropriately for the setting (time frame, prognosis / typical recovery course, etc)
Poor

Poor use of evidence, little analysis performed, lapses in clinical reasoning and judgment. Goals are not relevant or meaningful to client.
Fair

Analysis and evidence present, some evidence of clinical reasoning and judgment, goals are not entirely clear or measurable.
Good

Accurate analysis and evidence support the planning process;good clinical reasoning and judgment are evident; goals are measurable, meaningful, functional and directly related to the client's ability and need to engage in desired occupations. Culture and context are included.
Interventions
25 %

Process and skilled actions taken by occupational therapy practitioners in collaboration with the client to facilitate engagement in occupation related to health and participation; Specific strategies/approaches selected to direct the process of interventions on the basis of the client's desired outcomes, evaluation data, and evidence.
Poor

Interventions are poorly articulated, non-relevant to client. Not likely to improve occupation.
Fair

Interventions do not seem well planned or relevant. Interventions are preparatory in nature. Will improve occupation somewhat.
Good

Intervention approaches and intervention activities targeted, focused, clear, relevant, meaningful, intrinsically motivating and client centered: will improve occupation. Precautions clear.
Justification of Intervention Plan
20 %

Individual justifications of OT session activities are clear, detailed, logical, and show evidence of fit with selected theoretical models of practice. EBP annotation is comprehensive, clear, and critical, reflecting student's thoughtful analysis and critique of the article and its implications. Application of this evidence to intervention plan is obvious.
Poor

Intervention plans are poorly justified; annotation is unclear and/or lacks critical analysis.
Fair

Intervention plan is loosely justified, lacking clarity, clear ties to theory or models of practice &/or evidence cited. Annotation lacks full clarity and/or critical analysis
Good

Intervention plan justification is clear, thoughtful, and directly tied to theory or models of practice &/or evidence cited.
Form
5 %

Grammar, spelling, and sentence construction; Clarity of thought; use of APA citations
Poor

Greater than three errors. Informal in tone. Readability and point of paper is decreased due to number of errors. Writing is choppy with awkward or unclear passages.
Fair

Less than 4 errors on entire document. Informal in tone. Writing has few awkward or unclear passages.
Good

1-3 errors; writing succinct and clear with complete sentences. Writing style is scholarly, flowing and easy to follow. APA is perfect.



Keywords:
  • assessment,planning,interventions,evaluation


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16