Skip to main content
iRubric: SOAP Note Rubric

iRubric: SOAP Note Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SOAP Note Rubric 
Rubric for SOAP notes created by pharmacy students on advanced rotation
Rubric Code: LX6C7AC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Pharmacy  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Soap Note Grading Rubric
  Below Average

1 pts

Average

2 pts

Above Average

3 pts

Exceptional

4 pts

Grade

(N/A)

Background Information

CC
HPI
PMH
Med Hx
Social Hx
Allergies
ROS
Labs/Imaging

Below Average

Background information missing or completely inaccurate.
Average

Background information presented shows a cursory understanding of the patient but is not inappropriate.
Above Average

Background info shows a good understanding of the patients condition.
Exceptional

Background info is very thorough and shows full understanding of patients past and current conditions.
Grade
Subjective

Below Average

Subjective assessment is missing more than 2 critical elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Irrelevant information predominates subjective assessment.
Average

Subjective assessment is missing 2 elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Includes irrelevant information.
Above Average

Subjective assessment is missing 1 element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.
Exceptional

Subjective data is complete and accurately represents the patient's presentation.
Grade
Objective

Below Average

Objective assessment is not developed and/or the assessment is inappropriate for the presenting problem.
Average

Two or more elements needed for adequate objective evaluation of a patient's problem is missing. Includes irrelevant information.
Above Average

Objective assessment is missing an element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.
Includes irrelevant information.
Exceptional

Objective data is complete and accurately represents the patient's presentation.
Grade
Assessment

Presents hospital assessment and personal assessment.

Below Average

Lacks assessment and/or assessment is inappropriate or unacceptable based on subjective and objective data
Average

Assessment is limited and only minimally applicable to subjective and objective data. Missing information, shows basic understanding of patients condition.
Above Average

Adequate assessment of the patient. Demonstrates an underatanding of the disease states, may be missing minor information that does not affect the overall assessment.
Exceptional

Thorough assessment of the patient. Shows clear understanding of the patients disease states and current conditions. Able to critically evaluate hospital assessment and agree/disagree appropriately.
Grade
Plan

Presents hospital plan and personal plan.

Below Average

Plan is inappropriate, lacking essential components related to final diagnoses, or neglects patient education and follow-up.
Average

Plan is inadequate to fully address the identified problem. Able to discuss major points relating to patient care but misses much of the fine detail.
Above Average

Plan is appropriate and meets above criteria but is "generic" rather than individualized to the patient.
Exceptional

Plan is appropriate for the diagnosis and accurately addresses the problem identified. Plan is appropriate for this specific patient. Includes plans for monitoring/follow-up.
Grade
Evidence-based guidelines

Both primary and tertiary literature should be used.

Below Average

Incorrectly or fails to apply evidence-based guidelines to assesment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up. References used are poor or missing.
Average

Includes 2 or more errors in the application or omission of evidence-based guidelines. References used are related but not ideal.
Above Average

Includes only one minor error in the application or omission of evidence-based guidelines. References used are appropriate.
Exceptional

Correct application of evidence-based guidelines without omission. References used are the best available and generate good discussion.
Grade
Documentation

Below Average

Documentation does not meet expectations for the graduate level as evidenced by either of the following:
lay terminology, illogical sequencing, missing essential elements, multiple spelling/grammatical errors.
Average

Documentation needs to be more organized.
Documentation occasionally strays from standard format for SOAP documentation.
May occasionally stray from logical sequence but the reader is able to determine findings with minimal difficulty.
Above Average

Documentation meets criteria for "exceptional" but there is occasional redundant or distracting information. Documentation meets criteria for clarity but needs to be better organized.
Documentation occasionally strays from standard format for SOAP documentation.
Exceptional

Documentation is clear and well organized.
Appropriate medical terminology is used.
Format follows the standard and is professionally written. Medications are presented in a manner appropriate for a pharmacist (generic name, dose, route, frequency).
Grade





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16