Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric
Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric
Student's will complete collabrative writing assignments assignments to meet alternate writing standards. They will use peer assistance to research details about their own lives and interests. ST4. Use tech, to produce, publish and update projects and to display info. ST5. Gathering info from muliple source, assess usefulness, intergrate info, to maintain flow. ST6. Conduct short research project, or solve a problem demonstrate understanding of subject.
Rubric Code:
L2XAX86
By
SandraBett
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Software Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Average
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Peer/Teacher Interviews
Poor
Student did not participate in completing interviews that contained information about the subject. None of listed peers tutors and teachers interviewed.
Fair
Student did not participate in completing interviews that contained information about the subject. Less than half of listed peers tutors and teachers interviewed.
Average
Student participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information about the subject with at least half of listed peers tutors and teachers.
Good
Students successfully participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information on interactions with subject with all listed peers tutors and teachers.
Excellent
Students successfully participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information on interactions, personal descriptions with subject with all listed peers tutors and teachers.
Student Time Line/family history
Poor
Student did not display subject history birth to current.
Fair
Student displayed incomplete subject history birth to current family members.
Average
Student displayed subject history birth to current and family members.
Good
Student displayed subject history birth to current including personal milestones, and family members.
Excellent
Student displayed subject history birth to current including personal milestones, significant events, and family members.
Students Daily Activities
Poor
No video clips, no activities listed, no participation from subject.
Fair
Provided 1 video clip of student activities during school and at lest a description of subject's daily home life.
Average
Provided minimal video clips of subject activities during school and at lest a description of subject's daily home life.
Good
Provided video clips of all subject activities during school and at least a description of subject's daily home life.
Excellent
Provided video clips of all subject activities during school and video of homelife activities.
Technology Variation
Poor
No integration of technology soft ware used. No pictures scanned, no music.
Fair
Used 1 form of technology to attempt to intergrate information during presentation. Pictures added music used.
Average
Used at least 2 forms of technology to intergrate information to maintain a flow of information during presentation. Pictures added music used.
Good
Used a variety of technology to intergrate information to maintain effective flow of information through out the presentation. Pictures were scanned, and music selections added to quality of the presentation.
Excellent
Used a wide variety of technology to intergrate information to maintain effective flow of information through out the presentation. Pictures were scanned, and music selections added to quality of the presentation.
Subject Participation
Poor
No subject particpation. No collabrative effort with peers.
Fair
Subject participation was minimal. No documentation provided in journal entries.
Average
Subject participation in half of the project. Documentation provided in journal entries for activities subject participated.
Good
Subject participation throughout project. Documentation provided in journal entries for most activities subject participated.
Excellent
Subject participation throughout project. Documentation provided in journal entries for all activities subject participated in and collabrative effort is documented.
Editing and Revision
Poor
No documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations.
Fair
No documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations, but some attempts made to correct errors.
Average
Documentation in journals of preparation, and planning few errors made.
Good
Documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and some reconsiderations.
Excellent
Documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations.
Completion of project
Poor
Project not completed, not turned in.
Fair
Project completed with minimal requirements met.
Average
Project completed with adequate requirements met.
Good
Project completed missing 1 requirement but still effective.
Excellent
Project completed with all requirements met.
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.