Skip to main content
iRubric: PBL Chemistry - Clean Water project rubric

iRubric: PBL Chemistry - Clean Water project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
PBL Chemistry - Clean Water project 
PBL Chemistry - Clean Water project
Rubric Code: L234748
By rosmary
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric PBL Evaluation
  Below Standard

Not sufficient, improvements should be made.

1 pts

Approaching Standard

Good efforts were made to reach the evaluation standards, but there are still improvements expected by the teacher.

2 pts

At Standard

Excellent abilities to follow the assignments instructions and provide a serious work.

3 pts

Above Standard

Oustanding involvement and dedication to the project, going beyond the teacher's basic requirements when fulfilling the assignements.

4 pts

Completion of weekly tasks and meeting deadlines

- Completing project-related assignments and tasks every week
- Submitting assignments on time
Below Standard

Submitted and fullfilled less than 50% of the required assignments.
Could not meet the deadlines for every part of project.
Approaching Standard

Submitted and fullfilled between 50% and 70% of the required assignments.
Sometimes met the deadlines to submit and present assignments, but not on regular basis.
At Standard

Submitted and fullfilled all the required assignments.
Met the deadlines most of the time with less than 3 exceptions during the whole period of the project.
Above Standard

Submitted all the assignements and sometimes went beyond the required tasks to include new, creative aspects of the project (after approval from the teacher).
Met all deadlines, submitting assignments early, allowing for potential revision and improvements to be made on the project.
English proficiency

Abilities to deliver written assignments or oral presentation in proper English, regarding spelling, grammar and pronunciation skills (for oral presentations).
Below Standard

Many language mistakes are found in the written assignments. Most sentences have syntax errors and there was little attempt to make improvements in the English language. Oral presentations were very difficult to understand due to poor English skills and lack of practice before delivering the speech.
Approaching Standard

Written assignments contain spelling and grammar mistakes, but can be easily understood. There were efforts from the students to write in good English but there was no grammar or spelling check done before submitting the assignments. Oral presentations were mostly understandable, although pronunciation and grammar were a problem at times.
At Standard

Written assignments have been checked for spelling and grammar errors. The language was clear even though there could be syntax and vocabulary problems at times.
Oral presentations were clear, with little problems in term of grammar and pronunciation.
Above Standard

Oustanding skills in writing English, with no spelling or grammar mistakes. The vocabulary was precise and advanced, and the syntax was excellent most of the time.
Oral presentations were delivered in a brillant manner (using hand gestures, body language and confidence), with clear pronunciation and ease of speech.
Plan and make group decisions

Self and peer evaluation (to be filled and submitted for every student of the group)
Below Standard

Identified one way to “best”
manage and complete the work.
Agreed to complete their role or
task the group assigned and did
it their own way.
Displayed inflexibility that
sometimes causes conflict in the
group.
Approaching Standard

Restated some ways the group
discussed how best to manage
and complete the work.
Volunteered a way that they could
help the group.
Withdrawed from the discussion
when the group disagrees.
At Standard

Added ideas about how best to
manage and complete the work.
Suggested roles or tasks for the
group that are equitable.
Identified the main areas of
disagreement in the group to
help focus the conversation.
Above Standard

Suggested ways that the group
could manage and complete the
work, noting tradeoffs with
different approaches.
Suggested roles or tasks based
upon the unique knowledge,
abilities, or interests of those in
the group.
Suggested ways the group can
make decisions when there is a
disagreement.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98