Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History Formal Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Art History Formal Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History Formal Analysis Rubric 
Formal Analysis Assignment for GARTH 206
Rubric Code: KXC8947
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

100 pts

Very Good

85 pts

Average

75 pts

Undeveloped

65 pts

Unacceptable

55 pts

Summary & Submission
25 %

Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent
- Submitted completed handout on time
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent
- Submitted completed handout on time
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is vague, but object is fully described
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date
Undeveloped

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use resources and is unable to clearly describe the object
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
- Handout not submitted; missing portions of the assignment
Content & Development
25 %

Excellent

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Clear and well integrated formal description of art connects to analysis and references course content
- Purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Clear formal description of art to support analysis and references course content
- Purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or clear
- Description included but lacking detail to fully respond to assigned questions
Undeveloped

- Art not fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Formal description included but vague
- Questions were not adequately answered
Unacceptable

- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- No formal descriptions
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Organization & Structure
25 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Handout is thoughtfully completed
- Paragraph transitions are logical
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Handout thoughtfully completed
- Paragraph transitions present.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Handout complete
Undeveloped

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Handout incomplete
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Format & Length
15 %

Excellent

- Paper fulfills length requirements
-Format enhances readability of paper.
- Font and spacing correct
- Photograph included
Very Good

- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Occasional error
- Photograph included
Average

- Paper is over or under word length.
-Text not formatted correctly
- Photograph included
- Paper is not double spaced
Undeveloped

- Paper is inadequate or excessive in length.
- Photograph included
- Text is not formatted correctly AND paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
- Photograph missing
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Undeveloped

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or did not to complete significant portions of the assignment.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16