Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Essay rubric

iRubric: Group Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Essay 
Group Essay
Rubric Code: K2XCW7B
By danalel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Group Essay
Students work in groups to create 5 paragraph essay
  Poor

The student did not meet all the requirements of the paper

1 pts

Fair

The student almost met the requirements of the paper

2 pts

Improving

the student just met the requirements of the paper and with a little bit of work could have done better.

3 pts

Good

The student met the requirements of the paper

4 pts

Excellent

The student exceeded the requirements of the paper

5 pts

Thesis / Argument and Conclusion

The group was creative in the idea they were trying to prove. The conclusion is logical and supported by the examples.
Poor

The thesis statement did not present the direction of the paper or was missing entirely and the conclusion did not use the supporting information to prove the thesis.
Fair

The thesis statement did not present a direction for the paper or the conclusion did not use the supporting information to prove an idea in the paper.
Improving

The thesis statement presented the argument of the paper but was not provable or scholarly.
OR the conclusion did not show how the supporting information proved the thesis.
Good

Either the thesis statement presented a novel, interesting, and provable argument or the conclusion showed how the supporting information proved an idea presented in the introduction.
Excellent

The thesis statement presented a novel, interesting, and provable argument to direct the paper. The conclusion showed how the supporting information proved the thesis.
Examples / Supports

The examples used to support the argument were relevant and were explained.
Poor

The paper presented one or zero relevant supports and did not explain the support at all
Fair

The paper presented one to three supports which were either not relevant to the thesis or the supporting information was not explained in relationship to the thesis
Improving

The paper presented either one to three relevant supports or did not explain how the information substantiated the thesis.
Good

The paper presented two or three relevant supports or did not completely explain how the supporting information substantiated the thesis.
Excellent

The paper presented three relevant supports and explained how the supporting information substantiated the thesis
MLA format

the essay is written in correct MLA format and cited correctly
Poor

MLA format was not followed in the publication and citation of the paper
Fair

MLA format was somewhat followed with 7 - 10 errors in publication and/or citation standards
Improving

MLA format was followed with 4-6 errors in the public ation and citation of the paper.
Good

MLA format was mostly followed with 1-3 errors in publication and/or citation of the paper
Excellent

MLA format was followed in the publication and citations used in the paper with no errors.
mechanics

grammar, spelling, sentence structure, paragraph structure
Poor

The paper was turned in with 10 or more errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and paragraph structure.
Fair

The paper was turned in with 7-9 errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and paragraph structure
Improving

The paper was turned in with 5-6 errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and paragraph structure
Good

The paper was turned in with 1-4 errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and paragraph structure.
Excellent

The paper was turned in with no errors of grammar, spelling, syntax, and paragraph structure.
Members' Assessments

Each member of the group is to fill out assessment for all other members. The members' assessments will be averaged to get the rubric score.
Poor

Members felt this member did not contribute in a significant way to the project. The person did not stay on task, nor did this person follow directions.
Fair

Members felt this member needed close supervision to complete task. Did not follow directions completely.
Improving

Members felt this person did the required work on the task. Was not a leader, but followed direction of the leader(s)
Good

Members felt this member took a leadership role in the group. Kept the group on task 80% of the time.
Excellent

Members unanimously felt this person was the leader of the group. kept the group focused and on task




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16