iRubric: Group Project Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Project Rubric

This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment.

Rubric Code: K252444

By CHShistory

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Excellent 15 pts	Very Good 12 pts	Good 9 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 3 pts
Content x 2	Excellent Contains substantial relevant information. Content is based on information from research and contains more than expected.	Very Good Contains relevant information. Topic is covered well and contains slightly more than the expectations.	Good Contains adequate relevant to topic.Topic is covered but more information could have been added.	Fair Contains minimal information relevant to topic.Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed.	Poor Does not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.
Graphics/Use of Media x 2	Excellent Sections are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are used throughout to enhance project. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images. Uses other technology or creative ideas to enhance the project.	Very Good Sections are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. More than half of the sections use graphics and effects to enhance project. Information adequately supports images. Some use of media or creative ideas to enhance the project.	Good Sections are legible. Amount of text and graphics are balanced in the space provided. May have some grammatical errors. Less than half the sections have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times. Minimal use of media.	Fair Less than half the sections are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided or there are several grammatical errors or there is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. Little evidence of media or creative ideas used to enhance the project.	Poor The sections are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. No evidence of media or creative ides used to enhance the project.
Presentation	Excellent The presentation is well coordinated with group members. All material is presented using language that is original. Speaker is well informed and elaborates beyond the displayed material. Speaker makes engaging eye contact with audience.	Very Good The presentation is coordinated with group members. Most material is presented in new form and not as it is written on the screen. Speaker is well informed. Speaker makes sufficient eye contact with audience.	Good The presentation is adequate. The material is presented mostly as it appears in the project or the speaker reads from notes. The presenter makes adequate eye contact with the audience.	Fair The presenter makes minimal contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen of page.	Poor The presenter make no contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen of page.
Team work	Excellent Member contributes to group's success. Remains on task during work sessions. Meets all deadlines.	Very Good Member contributes to project's success. Remains on task during work sessions. Meets all deadlines.	Good Member contributes to assigned section's success. Remains on task during work sessions. Meets all deadlines.	Fair Member inconsistently contributes to project . Requires some redirection to remain on task during work sessions. Some deadlines not met.	Poor Member rarely contributes to project . Requires repeated redirection to remain on task during work sessions or is removed from group setting. More than half of the deadlines not met.

Keywords:

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric