iRubric: Student Led Discussions rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Student Led Discussions Student Led Discussions Students lead a class discussion on a given topic, reading or other assignment Rubric Code: K24B3CX By ldymacbeth3 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Student Led Discussions Rubric
	5 Choice of article submitted to instructor as required 5 pts	4 4 pts	3 Delay in submission of chosen article 3 pts	2 2 pts	1 No choice submitted 1 pts
Student Notes	5 Notes submitted to turnitin.com by 1st period on the day of the discussion along with "several" critical thinking questions. Hard copy of notes presented at the beginning of class	4 Notes submitted to turnitin.com at least one period prior to discussion along with "several" critical thinking questions. Hard copy of notes presented at the beginning of class.	3 Notes submitted to turnitin.com at least one period prior to discussion along with "several" critical thinking questions. Hard copy of notes needed to be retrieved from LMC, locker, etc.	2 Notes submitted to turnitin.com after class discussion. Hard copy presented in class.	1 Notes not submitted to turnitin.com. Hard copy presented in class.
Course Language	5 Use of course specific vocabulary occurs consistently and comfortably throughout notes and discussion.	4	3 Use of course specific vocabulary occurs but not consistently throughout notes and discussion.	2	1 Course vocabulary &/or academic tone is either misused or inappropriately used.
Critical Thinking	5 Participation consistently shows evidence of critical/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning, making connections to course material and relevant course topics.	4 Participation shows critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning most of the time, makes a few connections to social problems and relevant course topics.	3 Participation shows minimal critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning. Leaves out social problems context and/or relevant course topics.	2 Participation lacks evidence of critical thinking/reflective thinking and/or ethical reasoning.Leaves out social problems context and/or relevant course topics.	1 Participation lacks evidence of critical/reflective thinking or ethical reasoning. Leaves out social problems context and/or relevant course topics. Minimal effort evidenced.
Leading Discussion	5 Leader encourages and motivates involvement of other students without teacher intervention.	4 Leader initiates and responds to other student & instructor comments.	3 Leader occasionally responds to other students &/or instructor.	2 Leader responds to instructor prompts to encourage continued participation.	1 Leader does not encourage others to continued participation in the discussion even with teacher prompts.