Skip to main content
iRubric: Anatomy Research Paper Rubric

iRubric: Anatomy Research Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Anatomy Research Paper Rubric 
Research the approved topic. Include a single spaced abstract at the beginning of the paper that summarizes your subject. Submit a 4+ page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: K234BW9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
40 % Body Systems Research Paper
  Good

30 pts

Fair

20 pts

Poor

10 pts

Quality of research

40 pts

Good

--Cited 2+ sources
--Sources reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficient depth.
Fair

--Failed to cite 3 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Poor

--Failed to cite sources
--Source reliability uncreditable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Content

40 pts
Include: abstract, cause, short & long term effects, treatment & cure, new developments.

Good

--Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research.<BR>
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.<BR>
--Shows changes in thinking process throughout entire project.<BR>
--Shows some changes in thinking process throughout entire project.
Fair

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.<BR>
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.<BR>
--Shows a few changes in thinking process throughout entire project.
Poor

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.<BR>
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.<BR>
--Shows no change in thinking process throughout entire project.
Works Cited/Bibliography

10 pts

Good

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation
Grammar and Mechanics

10 pts

Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Fairly effective word choice.<BR>
--No more than 2 spelling errors.<BR>
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Fair

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--More than 3 spelling errors. <BR>
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Poor

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--More than 4 spelling errors. <BR>
--More than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16