Skip to main content
iRubric: Biodiversity Poster rubric

iRubric: Biodiversity Poster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Biodiversity Poster 
Poster Assessment Criteria
Rubric Code: JX64272
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Assessment Criteria
  Excellent

5 pts

Very Good

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Average

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Introduction

Excellent

Biodiversity well defined, with its importance clearly identified
Very Good

Good definition of Biodiversity with elements of the importance clear
Good

Either the definition of Biodiversity, OR the importance is identified, but not both
Average

Either the definition of Biodiversity, OR the importance is present, but one or the other is missing
Poor

No definition of Biodiversity, and incorrect definition and no attempt to comment on its importance
Content

Excellent

Report sheets from activities well completed, and findings reported on the poster match these findings
Very Good

Report sheets from the activities are well completed with occasional missing data, but findings match data that was recorded
Good

Report sheets missing data, OR findings only partially match the findings recorded
Average

Report sheets incomplete, and findings inconclusive based on the data
Poor

Report sheets not submitted so unable to assess quality of findings on the poster
Conclusion

Excellent

Conclusion shows deep understanding of Nathalia's biodiversity, and makes great suggestions for sustaining or improving it into the future
Very Good

Conclusion shows partial understanding of Nathalia's biodiversity, but still makes good suggestions for sustaining or improving it into the future
Good

Either the conclusion is not relevant based on the data reported, OR limited/no suggestions provided on future directions
Average

The conclusion is not relevant based on the data reported, AND limited/no suggestions provided on future directions
Poor

No attempt to provide a conclusion
Presentation

Excellent

This poster is incredible, I would pick this poster to look at from a room full of other posters!

Effective use of digital presentation, images and styles.
Very Good

What a great poster, I would definitely make time to read this poster.


Good use of digital presentation, images and styles.
Good

It's pretty good, I would read it if I had time.


Adequate use of digital presentation, images and styles, but might be improved with more use of imagery, tables, etc.
Average

I would read it, but it probably wouldn't be the first choice.


Poor use of digital presentation, images and styles. Mostly text without images.
Poor

I would read this, but I might find it a bit hard.


Very poor use of digital presentation, images and styles- blank with text as only visual.
References

Excellent

Evidence of additional material consulted is included on the poster
Very Good

Most material consulted is referenced on the poster
Good

Less than 50% of material consulted is included as references on the poster
Average

Only evidence is use of Wikipedia (Wikipedia IS NOT an acceptable reference)
Poor

No evidence of reference material be used.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16