- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Policy Proposal Presentation SOSA 3168 (2021) rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Policy Proposal Presentation SOSA 3168 (2021) Policy Proposal Rubric Code: J2X5239 By DanielSalas Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

SOSA 3168 POLICY PROPOSAL
	Below expectations 8 pts	Approaches expectations 11 pts	Meets expectations 13 pts	Exceeds expectations 15 pts
Problem Identification 10 % Identify development challenges that can be addressed by policy	Below expectations Topics do not fit the assignment	Approaches expectations Topics fit the basic requirements of the assignment.	Meets expectations Topics fit the requirements. The framing is adequate but missing some nuance.	Exceeds expectations The challenges are defined with great precision
Analysis 40 % What is the relevance of this issue? History? Causes? Practical examples?	Below expectations Analysis is incomplete or missing.	Approaches expectations Demonstrates some critical thinking, but shows scarce appreciation of the topic and little grasp of supporting data.	Meets expectations Conveys reasonable appreciation of topic, and adequate grasp of supporting data, showing effective research. Minimal mistakes.	Exceeds expectations Analysis demonstrates deep knowledge of the topic and sophisticated understanding of social dynamics. Great research.
Policy recommendation 30 % How clear is the recommendation? How well does it relate to the analysis?	Below expectations Missing or incomplete. Incoherent or unrelated to the analysis	Approaches expectations The recommendation lacks elaboration and consideration of potential effects of implementation.	Meets expectations Reasonable policy recommendations. Show basic appreciation of facts and experts' opinion. Follows logically from the analysis. Minimal inconsistencies.	Exceeds expectations Sound recommendation. Deep grasp of facts. Follows logically from analysis, showing good research. Adequately considers potential results of implementation.
Structure & format 20 % Does the work have introduction and conclusion? How are arguments presented? Does the work follows guidelines of format (length, bibliography, etc.)	Below expectations No structure present. No references.	Approaches expectations A structure is discernible, but ideas often lack adequate transition. Poor use of bibliography. Mistakes in format.	Meets expectations Good and sound structure. Good bibliography. Few mistakes.	Exceeds expectations Clear and effective structure. Appropriate references. No formal mistakes in bibliography or any other aspect.