iRubric: Podcast rubric

Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. Speaker is not identified.

Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. Alludes to who is speaking/host of the podcast.

Describes what the topic is, as well as engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. Tells who is speaking.

Catchy and clever introduction. Provides attention grabbing introduction and establishes both a clear topic of the podcast and builds rapport with the listeners; engages the listener immediately and clearly states name.

Intro was very inclusive and creative/catchy/funny from the start. Tonality was engaging and it sounded like I was having a conversation with a friend. The host was mysterious as to what they would be talking about but let us know within a reasonable amount of time. Introduced herself and was funny (I think). 13 points awarded.

You attempt to explain the topic but your explanation is either incorrect or very difficult to understand/follow. Does not talk about topic for most of the podcast and there is no ending to the podcast.

You describe your topic but perhaps your descriptions contain an error or are difficult to understand. Some information is inaccurate or close-minded.
Vocabulary is adequate and there is no exploration/growth of the topic into different areas.

You describe your topic correctly and your description is understandable. Accurate information is provided succinctly.
Vocabulary is appropriate. Includes an ending note to the audience and the bulk of the podcast is creatively explored in terms of content.

Describes the topic very clearly/concisely; it's interesting. Your content is correct/easy to understand. You use applicable examples to illustrate concepts and make it relatable for the audience. It's creative & original content and includes an ending. Creativity/ divergent thinking can be heard by how the host can carry this subject into different walks of life; host can always bring it back/tie it to the topic, while providing insight into the hosts life through vulnerability and openness.

Rants were prevalent, but I like my podcasts how I made mine. I like going off topic and seeing where the conversation can take me and the roads we can end up on. Topic is always brought back around in the end and it is easy to follow along and listen. Host was open, vulnerable, and encouraged creative thinking, including during her interview with a guest. 12 points given.

Your podcast contains a real world example.

Your podcast contains a real world example but perhaps you didn't explain it correctly or you didn't fully explain why it was relevant to your subject.

Your podcast contains a real world example and you correctly explain the concept/idea behind the example.

Your podcast mentions how your concept is connected to the real world more than two times (at least). You thoroughly explain the connection and how the topic is connected to your example and the lives of the listeners. The listeners have to be able to see where you are coming from and maybe gain a new perspective.

Real world examples were given plenty of times and extreme vulnerability can be seen. There was both abstract and concrete thinking, imagination was used, and real world examples were extremely relatable/relevant to today's society/issues. New perspectives were given, both the host and guest had different viewpoints. 13 points given.

Podcast was less than 5 minutes in length. There was loud and distracting noise in the background and/or the people talking cannot be heard/are hard to understand. Quality unacceptable.

Podcast was between 5-15 minutes in length. There is some distracting noise(s) in background and/or the voices sound quiet or far away sometimes; inconsistent volume level. Poor understanding of audio recording.

Podcast was between 15-20 minutes in length. Minor issues with background noises and/or with the voices of the host/guest; somewhat consistent volume level. Good understanding of audio recording

Podcast was more than 25 minutes in length. No distracting background noise and the voices of the host and guest(s) were clear and able to be heard without an issue. Consistent volume level. Excellent understanding of audio recording.

Podcast was 45+ minutes, the length of a real podcast. It is clear that the host has a lot to talk about and it good at carrying on a conversation. From the length and amount of editing/use of music, the host put her heart into it and clearly enjoys this. Guest and host voices were clear and can be heard throughout the whole podcast. It sounded like host/guest were close to the microphone. 14.29 points given.

TOTAL: 90.29 points