- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Discussion Prompt rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Discussion Prompt Discussion Prompt Simple rubric to grade sequence paragraphs. Focus: proper capitalization, end marks, sequence/time-order words, and rich/vivid details. Rubric Code: J229WXW By jenpalacios Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Survey Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Best 5 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor/No Effort 1 pts
Discussion Prompt Initial Response	Best Response to initial prompt with relevant, insightful, and thought provoking concepts from the assigned reading was relayed. If applicable, student also included example(s) from their own experience(s) from working with special education students and made a clear connection to the chapter concepts. Students met the minimum 300 word count.	Good Response to initial prompt had some connection but overall lacked relevant, insightful and thought provoking concepts from the assigned reading. If applicable, student's included examples from their experience with working with special education students, however information only entailed some relevancy from the chapter reading. Student did not meet the minimum 300 word count.	Poor/No Effort Response to prompt was not relevant and concepts from the assigned reading was not applied. If applicable, student's included examples from working with special education students, but information did not have any relevancy to the discussion prompt. Student did not meet the minimum 300 word count
Peer Response	Best Peer response(s) were rich and definitely expounded from making reference from the assigned reading. If applicable, student also expounded with field experience. Students met the minimum 200 word count.	Good Peer response(s) were somewhat addressed but lacked richness in thought and detail from the assigned reading. If applicable, student expounded with field experience and made some connection. Student did not meet the minimum 200 word count.	Poor/No Effort Peer response(s) were not addressed or fell flat and had no relevancy in thought and detail. If applicable, student expounded with field experience but made no connection. Student did not meet the minimum 200 word count.