Skip to main content
iRubric: way of council rubric

iRubric: way of council rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
way of council 
way of council
Rubric Code: HXAC98C
By mtekos
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Social Justice 12 Final Project
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Introduction

Excellent

Student was engaged in the learning activities and research. Able to express this understanding verbally and rolling them into the next steps fo the project.

Effectively learned the basics of the way of council as well as the current issues students are facing.

Well prepared to be a helpful and contributing member of a group in the next phase; "Teamwork".
Good

Student was engaged in the learning activities and research. Able to express this understanding verbally and rolling them into the next steps fo the project.

Effectively learned the basics of the way of council as well as the current issues students are facing.

Well prepared to be a helpful and contributing in the next phase; "Teamwork".
Fair

Student was engaged in the learning activities and research. Able to express this understanding verbally and rolling them into the next steps fo the project.

Effectively learned the basics of the way of council as well as the current issues students are facing.

Well prepared to be a helpful and contributing in the next phase; "Teamwork".
Poor

Student was engaged in the learning activities and research. Able to express this understanding verbally and rolling them into the next steps fo the project.

Effectively learned the basics of the way of council as well as the current issues students are facing.

Well prepared to be a helpful and contributing in the next phase; "Teamwork".
Teamwork

Excellent

Student was helpful and contributed to the group, helping facilitate their small group 'council'. Was proactive, taking initiative with a clear understanding of the rules and intentions.

Showed high level of leadership and collaboration with team by listening, sharing ideas and work load, and helping other team members.
Good

Listened to, shared ideas with, and supported the efforts of others. Did not disrupt the group.
Student was helpful and contributed to the group, helping facilitate their small group 'council'. Was proactive, taking initiative with a clear understanding of the rules and intentions.

Showed high level of leadership and collaboration with team by listening, sharing ideas and work load, and helping other team members.
Fair

Did not consistently listen to, share ideas with, or support the efforts of others. Made some effort to be a team player.
Poor

Rarely listened to, shared ideas with, or helped other team members. Was not a team player.
Process

Excellent

Participation was at a high-level, listening intently, responding with relevant insights.

Showed peer empathy and emotional intelligence through heart-felt sharing and lucid self reflections.
Good

Participation was at a high-level with listening intently, responding with relevant insights.
Exhibited with lucid self reflective responses. Showed peer to peer empathy and emotional intelligence and understanding through heart felt sharing.
Fair

Participation was at a low level with distracted listening, responds with non-relevant insights.

Exhibited with lucid self reflective responses. Showed peer to peer empathy and emotional intelligence and understanding through heart felt sharing.
Poor

Participation was minimal, had trouble listening with little response to topics, or responses were non-relevant.

Lack of empathetic responses or lucid self-reflections.
Evaluation

Excellent

Student give thorough evaluate their peers with a clarity relative to the rules and expectations of counsel.

Student gives thorough self evaluation describing their emotional journey through the Webquest.
Good

Student gave surface evaluation of peers with some reference to the rules and expectations.

Student gives surface self evaluation with trouble describing their emotional journey through the Webquest.
Fair

students evaluate themselves and their peers with a clarity about the rules and expectations of counsel.

Students shared their emotional journey lucidly in their evaluation of the Webquest.
Poor

students created aware able to evaluate themselves and their peers with a clarity about the rules and expectations of counsel.

Students shared their emotional journey lucidly in their evaluation of the Webquest.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98