Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Group Project Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Group Project Research Paper
Group Project Research Paper
Research the approved topic. Submit one group 10-20 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following JECT referencing guidelines. Include a reference page citing at least 3-5 sources per group member. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic chosen, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code:
HXA3976
By
Mindy1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Medical
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
Excellent
25 pts
Good
10 pts
Needs Improvement
5 pts
Quality of research
Excellent
--Cited 3-5 or more sources per group member <BR>
--Sources reliable and properly cited.<BR>
--All information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis.<BR>
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good
--Cited 3 but < 5 sources per group member <BR>
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.<BR>
--Most information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of thesis.<BR>
--Research of sufficient depth.
Needs Improvement
--Failed to cite 3 sources per group member <BR>
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.<BR>
--Some information relevant to thesis.<BR>
--Information provided to support some elements of thesis.<BR>
--Surface research.
Content
Excellent
--discussion interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.<BR>
--Support for argument complex, complete, & in-depth.<BR>
--Writers involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.<BR>
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Good
--Argument somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and<BR>
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Needs Improvement
--Argument too broad or narrow for length of paper and<BR>
--Support for argument barely sufficient.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
References
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- No more than three errors in format or punctuation.
Good
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- Four to nine errors in format or punctuation.
Needs Improvement
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.<BR>
-- More than than 10 errors in format or punctuation.
Grammar and Mechanics
Excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.<BR>
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.<BR>
--No spelling errors.<BR>
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Fairly effective word choice.<BR>
--No more than 5 spelling errors.<BR>
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Needs Improvement
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.<BR>
-- Correct word choice.<BR>
--More than 6 spelling errors. <BR>
--More than 4 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.<BR>
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
Computers
English
Medical
Types:
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.