iRubric: Employment Law/Human Rights Tribunal Hearing rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Employment Law/Human Rights Tribunal Hearing

In your professional career as a Human Resources specialist, you will more than likely encounter claims under the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Employment Standards Act. Indeed, it is very likely that you may at one point in time be on the opposite side of a claim yourself. This assignment requires learners to file, reply to and adjudicate upon claims made under both of these statutes in a role-play. Learners will arbitrarily be assigned into teams of 2 each of Employer, Employee and Adjudicator. One of each of these will be the Spokesperson/Counsel for the Employer & Employee and the other the client. For the 2nd assignment, learners will be assigned to a different role.

Rubric Code: H32A32

By Cherylbatten

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Law

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: (none)

Mini Trial
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 5 pts	Poor 0 pts
Research	Excellent The research was thorough and well thought out. Included all of the major facts and arguments of the case. Includes 6+ sources.	Good Research was well thought out and has most of the key facts and arguments about the case. Includes 4-5 resources.	Fair Research was done but is missing key details and arguments. Does not include a details about lower court decisions.	Poor Research was incomplete or not done at all.
The Pleadings/Decision	Excellent The pleading/decision is well written and includes no spelling or grammatical errors. It includes each of the required sections in the right format. Includes strong analysis and well thought out arguments. Followed the format and the Rules of Procedure.	Good The pleading/decisionis well written but includes 1-4 spelling or grammatical errors. Each of the required sections are included. Good analysis and arguments. Mostly followed the format and the Rules of Procedure.	Fair The pleading/decisionis completed but includes 5-9 spelling and grammatical errors. The brief is missing a required section. An attempt to analyze the material was made but didn't go far enough. More or less followed the format and the Rules of Procedure.	Poor The pleading/decision was missing 2 major sections or was not completed at all. Many grammatical and spelling errors. No attempt at analysis is made. Did not followed the format and the Rules of Procedure.
The Debate	Excellent Strong persuasive argument is made. Followed the format and the Rules of Procedure. Professional, courteous, and well organized. The group made each of its main points. Every group member participated.	Good Persuasive arguments were made. Professional and organized. Missed 1 key point or argument. 1 group member did not participate. Followed the format and appeared professional and organized. Mostly followed the Rules of Procedure.	Fair A couple of the group members did not participate in the debate. Appeared professional. Somewhat disorganized. Made most of their groups key points but lacked persuasiveness. More or less followed the format and the Rules of Procedure.	Poor Group was unable to make several of their key points. Didn't follow the format of the debate. Appeared unprofessional and unorganized. Not all group members participated. Disrespectful of others during debate. Did not followed the Rules of Procedure.

Keywords:

mock trial, mock human rights tribunal hearing

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric