Skip to main content
iRubric: Atomic Model rubric

iRubric: Atomic Model rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Atomic Model 
Student will create a 3-D model of a canal. Student will include a research paper with the model.
Rubric Code: H2X5259
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Model of Atom in 3-D
50 % Bohr model design of an assigned atom in 3-D.
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

10 pts

Good

15 pts

Excellent

20 pts

Design of Model
10 pts

Poor

Group failed to complete an atom model.
Fair

Canal/Map is not accurate in terms of scale, design, and
Good

Canal/Map is accurate but lacks some information. Canal model/Map has some design flaws. Choice of materials is appropriate for model.
Excellent

Canal/Map is accurate and student has included all required information. Atom model is neat and well designed. Choice of materials is well suited for model. Student model design exceeds all required expectations.
Creativity
10 pts

Poor

Group failed to complete an atom model.
Fair

Project appears forced, hard to follow.
It appears to have too many parts that are strange and do not serve any purpose.
Good

Project is well done, but it is not unique.
It has many similar components as other models.
Excellent

Project is unique, and sets itself apart from the others. The project shows creativity that is exciting and fresh. Student creativity exceeds all required expectations.
Color
5 pts

Poor

Group failed to complete an atom model.
Fair

The Group has no color at all in the project.
Good

The Group has color in the project but has failed to color-code elevations and water/land correctly.
Excellent

All parts of the project are correct and complete. The project has adequate color, and all parts are color-coded accordingly. Student model exceeds all required expectations..
Labeling
5 pts

Poor

The Group failed to label the scale, elevation, and compass.
Fair

The Group made an attempt to label elevation, scale, compass, but labels were not clear.
Good

The Group labeled the Canal/Map but with some incorrect spelling.
Excellent

All parts of the canal/map were labeled correctly.
Effort
10 pts

Poor

Student failed to complete an atom model.
Fair

The project look as if it lacks significant effortor that it was possibly thrown together in a rush. The project still needs quite a bit of work and does not appear complete. Many errors are evident in the work.
Good

The project appears to be mostly complete; although, it could use some minor touch up here and there.
Excellent

The project clearly shows that much effort was put forth and the project appears complete. Student model exceeds all required expectations.
Presentation
10 pts

Poor

Group could not present their model/map to the class.
Fair

Group presentation was done, but was confusing or unclear. The student did not demonstrate an understanding of the topic.
Good

Group presented their canal or map to the class, but was missing few key components, such as: Scale, legend/key, compass
Excellent

Group presented all components of the project to the class with ease and confidence. Group presentation exceeds all required expectations.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16