iRubric: WORLD ART PROJECT rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

WORLD ART PROJECT

2nd test grade rubric - piece and presentation

Rubric Code: H2A4X3

By jpetrosky

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

WORLD ART
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent!! 4 pts
Piece design and implementation	Poor Piece was unfinished.	Fair Piece was completed but showed a lack of prepared design.	Good Piece showed elements of prepared design and was completed.	Excellent!! Piece showed elements of prepared design; piece was completed and showed effort.
Region/Area of World	Poor Piece did not display a particular area of the world.	Fair Piece displayed an area of the world but it was not clear without further information which region it was.	Good Piece clearly displayed an area of the world.	Excellent!! Piece clearly displayed an area of the world and promoted historical or cultural elements to those who were previously uninformed.
Presentation Information	Poor Presentation did not answer all questions.	Fair Presentation only answered 5 questions or less.	Good Presentation only answered 6-9 questions.	Excellent!! Presentation answered all questions clearly.
Presentation Time	Poor Presentation was delayed a day because it was not prepared for class.	Fair Presentation took less than 5 minutes.	Good Presentation took over 7 minutes.	Excellent!! Presentation took 5-7 minutes.
Knowledge Level	Poor Presentation proved student's complete lack of understanding of area and piece.	Fair Presentation proved student's lack of understanding of area and piece by needing much prompting.	Good Presentation proved student's understanding of area and piece but needed some prompting.	Excellent!! Presentation proved student's knowledge level about piece and area of the world without much prompting from screen or poster.
Presentation Grammer	Poor Grammer was often incorrectly used during the presentation; text lingo was written multiple times. Written assignment was obviously not proofread.	Fair Grammer was incorrectly used during the presentation; written assignment was quickly proofread. There were 7-10 errors.	Good Grammer was used properly during the presentation most of the time. There were 3-6 errors.	Excellent!! Grammer was used properly during the presentation. There were 0-2 errors.
Appropriateness	Poor Student did not handle herself appropriately during presentation (fidgeting, side comments, giggling, etc.).	Fair Student only handled herself appropriately during presentation half of the time (fidgeting, side comments, giggling, etc.).	Good Student handled herself appropriately during presentation most of the time (fidgeting, side comments, giggling, etc.).	Excellent!! Student handled herself appropriately during presentation all of the time and showed exemplary performance skills.
Personal Presentation	Poor Student appeared ashamed, embarressed and disinterested during presentation. She did not represent her area respectfully.	Fair Student appeared embarressed at first but tried to pull herself together to finish the presentation respectfully.	Good Student was nervous but worked to represent her country respectfully.	Excellent!! Student showed enthusiam, leadership qualities, and exemplary performance skills during this presentation.
Personal Presentation	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent!!

Keywords:

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric